| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Engineering Review - Street and Storm
|
No Comments
|
10/27/2025
|
10/22/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streets
|
No Comments
|
10/27/2025
|
10/22/2025
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streets
|
Corrections
|
10/22/2025
|
10/16/2025
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Provide Profile informaiton for the street.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Typical section doesn't meet the City requirements for a commercial Local street. Please provide an appropriate pavement profile.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Street and Storm
|
Corrections
|
10/29/2025
|
10/15/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Complete plan set is required. Submit a complete plan set.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Provide updates to all relevant sheets such as the general overview sheet showing the location of the undefined street. Use labels as needed to define this undefined road. Without a general overview sheet showing the location of this road, it is undefined, non-locatable without special knowledge, and is missing context.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
It would appear a set of curb inlets and pipe is required to capture stormwater along this long stretch. Maximum length on a street before curb inlets are required is 400 feet. It is not clear where the next curb inlet is located because you have not provided a general overview sheet. Evaluate and show the locations of these curb inlets, pipe size, etc.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Revise the stormwater plans as necessary to accommodate the new curb inlet/pipe combination.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Water
|
No Comments
|
10/10/2025
|
10/07/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Water
|
Corrections
|
10/02/2025
|
09/30/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Revision clouds are shown, but were missing notation of the revision on the plan view (e.g., "6" with a triangle), and the lower right hand corner revision list was missing the "6" with a triangle.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Water
|
Corrections
|
09/24/2025
|
09/23/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
All Sheets: a. A revision date of 9/17/2025 is shown in the bottom right hand corner of the plans, but no corresponding revision number was provided, nor was any apparent revision shown on the plans which would correspond to the date of these revisions. Provide a revision number (e.g., 6 surrounded by a triangle?), and show where these revisions were made on the plans.
|
|
|
updated water plans showing the 4 water fire service extensions for the lots on the 7 road
|
|
Engineering Review - Street and Storm
|
Corrections
|
08/19/2025
|
08/13/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Misc
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.306: a. RCP or CPP shall be required for storm line 17. b. HGL for design storms was not shown on storm line 17. c. water main appears to be less than 18 inches as measured from bottom of water line to top of RCP/CPP pipe. d. revision block was not detailed as shown for previous revisions. Is this revision 6? If so, note it.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Sanitary
|
Corrections
|
08/07/2025
|
07/25/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Sanitary
|
No Comments
|
05/19/2025
|
05/08/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
See email comment letter from Amanda Bagwell.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Street and Storm
|
Approved with Conditions
|
05/19/2025
|
05/06/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
DE Engineers Estimate
Corrective Action Required
The Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Costs has been accepted for this project, and the Engineering Plan Review and Inspection Fee (which is calculated as 3% of the total infrastructure cost plus a water test inspection fee(s)), and the water tap and meter setup fee have been included. These must be paid prior to the issuance of an infrastructure permit and/or the final processing of a building permit. $112,802.44
|
|
|
DE Contact Field Eng. Inspector
Corrective Action Required
Prior to the commencement of any construction activities, the Contractor shall contact Field Engineering Inspections at (816) 969-1200 to schedule a project coordination meeting with the assigned Field Engineering Inspector.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Street and Storm
|
Corrections
|
05/05/2025
|
05/02/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Curb inlet 1-2 and field inlet 1-3 appear to be too small to accommodate the outside pipe diameter of the outgoing and/or incoming pipes. A minimum of 6 inches between the wall of the box and the outside of the pipe is required on all sides, and both of these structures do not appear to meet this requirement.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Plans are missing striping plan for crosswalks. Correction required.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Sanitary
|
Corrections
|
05/05/2025
|
05/02/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
See email comment letter from Amanda Bagwell.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Traffic Signal
|
No Comments
|
04/11/2025
|
04/11/2025
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Generally, pavement design is not reviewable as submitted. Please include backup calcs for ESALs, ADT, truck distribution, soil properties. and rational for material coefficient inputs.
Revised Pavement Design was not included.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Truck percentage seems low for this proposed roadway.
Expect truck count to be about 10%, so is this 2% tractor trailers only, which seems okay, but ignores school buses, trash trucks, delivery vehicles, etc.
Revised Pavement Design was not included.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
CBR should be 3.0 unless there are lab tests showing otherwise. Please submit Geotech work and lab testing for review, or change to a CBR of 3.0.
Revised Pavement Design was not included.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Submit PCC pavement recommendation to evaluate life-cycle cost to the City.
Revised Pavement Design was not included.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The Overall Phasing Plan shows Phase 1 extending through December while the Phas One plan shows it through November. Plans should match. Additionally, this is showing a 9 month closure rather than the 6 month cosure as discussed with staff.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please revise the Signing Plan per the marked up sheet sent by staff on 3/7/2025.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please provide a detailed Pavement Marking plan.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please add a special sign on MO 291 and SW 3rd St stating OLDHAM PKWY CLOSED FOILLOW DETOUR.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please specify Iteris Next Video detection system.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The Cable quantities seem low based on a few random checks. Please be sure that you are including the required slack for each length per the LS 5900 design criteria.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The cable from the power supply to the cabinet should be 3c-#2 rather than 1C#10.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The second power line should go straight to the street light disconnet rather than through pull box number one. If this is a double service dosconnet is should be labeled as such.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
In the Cabinet Splice should be Corning Wall-Mountable Interconnect Center rather than Gator Patch.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The Fiber Optic Data Link Switcch should be speced as Cisco, Antaira, Comtrol, or Transition with similar specs.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The Fiber Distribution Unit in a pull box, and outdoor dome enclosure. Typ: Thincol Fiber Optic Splice Enclosure.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
All Fiber should be Single Mode.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Street and Storm
|
Corrections
|
04/11/2025
|
04/11/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.301: No cardinal directions or number of openings was provided for the field inlets. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.302: No cardinal directions or number of openings was provided for the field inlets. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Curb inlet 1-2 and field inlet 1-3 appear to be too small to accommodate the outside pipe diameter of the outgoing and/or incoming pipes. A minimum of 6 inches between the wall of the box and the outside of the pipe is required on all sides, and both of these structures do not appear to meet this requirement.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.303: Incoming crown of pipe is shown below receiving crown of pipe on one (1) segment. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Street underdrains shall be called-out at all sump locations. The underdrains shall be connected between curb inlets at the sump. Show the location of these underdrains, and provide a reference to the detail showing how these will be installed. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Plans are missing striping plan for crosswalks. Correction required.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Sanitary
|
Approved with Conditions
|
04/11/2025
|
04/11/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.403: 1. There are two (2) instances where sanitary line and storm line are less than 18 inches vertical separation. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.401: 1. Notes are vague concerning the abandonment of the existing manhole located on Clearview Acres Lot 10. For instance, notes say to use a "watertight plug", which is not defined, and do not address remaining backfill, restoration, sodding, seeding, topsoil, mulch, etc. after placing "1/2" clean gravel". 2. The note stating "plug sanitary main outside limits of permanent pool" does not make sense. Clarify what is intended. 3. Recommend removal of a portion of the existing 10 inch sanitary sewer line to eliminate the potential of impacting the pond. Extra penetrations within the dam are not recommended, and the removal of the existing line as appropriate would eliminate one source of "piping".
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
A revised cost estimate with updated quantities is required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
An MDNR concurrence letter will follow shortly. No construction of the sanitary can take place until an MDNR construction permit has been issued.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streetlight
|
No Comments
|
04/11/2025
|
04/04/2025
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streets
|
No Comments
|
04/11/2025
|
04/04/2025
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
New pavement letter uploaded. Review started 3.24
|
|
Engineering Review - Street and Storm
|
Corrections
|
03/21/2025
|
03/21/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Will the large storm line on the west side of the project encroach-upon the structural portions of the retaining wall? The typical section view for the retaining wall is vague, and it would appear a more thorough design be prepared for a retaining wall of this magnitude. For instance, it is not clear whether the retaining wall will need to be considered as part of the dam design. It is not clear how far the footing of the retaining wall will extend into the subgrade, and how far the flat area on the bottom adjacent grade will extend horizontally, thus affecting the setback from 100 year WSE within the basin, setback from sanitary sewer(s), setback from water line(s), and setback from public storm lines. Evaluation and correction required as appropriate.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Index of Sheets on Cover Page does not match what is shown in the plan set. As one example, the signage plan is not shown in the index. Go through the index of sheets, and ensure the index of sheets matches exactly what is shown in the plans. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
It is not possible to review the ADA-accessbile ramps and ADA-accessible routes without traffic signal plans at Oldham and Fieldhouse, and the streetlight plans. No further review at these locations were conducted. Informational comment.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Submittal was still missing the streetlight plans. No further review of the road geometry was conducted along the area in question. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
No phasing plan was submitted. This has been requested on several occasions, but nothing has been officially submitted with the plans. A specific phasing plan shall be required, and shall be a part of the construction plans. Informal verbal agreements are not sufficient for a phasing plan. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
How are you managing the existing storm line adjacent to Lot 204 Hillsdale? Are you proposing to remove this storm line? What are you planning in terms of an end treatment of this line? Are you proposing any sort of inlet at the end? Evaluate and correct as appropriate.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Refer to comment #22 in previous applicant letter. Rip rap design and dimension callouts and material callouts were requested, but the response to comments stated it is still "added", but I can find no calculations. No further review was conducted. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
According to the plan view and the typical section view of the retaining wall, you are proposing to allow sheetflow of stormwater over the tops and sides of the retaining wall. Grading should be revised to direct stormwater to the field inlets and storm lines serving this project. Sheetflow and/or concentrated flow shall not be allowed to cascade over the retaining wall. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Refer to comment #25 in previous applicant letter. None of the typical sections provided for this project in regard to street construction is sufficient for arterial streets. The Design and Construction Manual requires the design to be completed with the aid of a geotechnical report based on actual sampling and based on Section 5203.11 of the Design and Construction Manual. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Refer to comment #25 in the previous applicant letter. In addition to a engineered design of the pavement based on a geotechnical report, all pavements shall include either chemically-stabilized subgrade or geogrid in the design of the base layer. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Regardless of the design of the arterial street pavement sections, the asphaltic concrete or portland cement concrete sections shall be KCMMB mix. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.301: Footing of the retaining wall over the 48 inch storm line does not appear to show the footing. It appears the bottom of the wall is called-out, not the bottom of the footing. It appears the retaining wall will be using the pipe as structural support due to the minimal distance between the footing of the retaining wall and the outside of the HDPE pipe. It would appear the pipe beneath the retaining wall should be upgraded to RCP at a minimum. Evaluation and correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.211: Why are you showing the retention basin and dam within this plan set? In addition, why does this version on Sheet C.211 vary from the other version contained in the retention basin and grading plan? Grading is different, among other issues. Suggest removing any of these separate plans from this particular plan set. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.301: No cardinal directions or number of openings was provided for the field inlets. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.301: No cardinal directions for the various storm structure elements were provided for flowline in or flowline out. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.302: No cardinal directions or number of openings was provided for the field inlets. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.302: No cardinal directions for the various storm structure elements were provided for flowline in or flowline out. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.302: Why construct two (2) separate storm lines to the detention basin? Wouldn't it be easier to connect Line 3 serving the curb inlet (erroneously shown on the profile as a field inlet, and erroneously labeled as 3-2 even though it appears to be curb inlet 3-1) to the larger system to the west? Evaluate and correct.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.301: What is the reasoning behind the excessive storm line slope to the retention basin? A 10% slope may lead to issues within the retention basin, and good engineering judgment would cause me to question such a design, especially given the proximity to a tall retaining wall. Evaluate and correct.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
"PUBLIC" versus "PRIVATE" has been requested on the profile view of storm lines, but remains unresolved. Go through the plans and label each profile view of the storm line as "PRIVATE" or "PUBLIC" as appropriate. This is needed to enable our GIS technicians to enter the data for our GIS system. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Overall Layout: Storm line 11 is shown too close to the retaining wall near the retention basin. Retaining wall shall be installed outside the limits of the easement, including any foundation, geogrid tie-backs, drainage system, or other item ancilary to the retaining wall. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Field inlet sizing (i.e., dimensions) on Storm Line 1 is called-out incorrectly (e.g., 4x4) on the plan view versus what is shown on the profile view. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.303: Incoming crown of pipe is shown below receiving crown of pipe on one (1) segment. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Is there a particular reason Storm Line 5 is shown so deep? There does not seem to be any compelling reason to allow such a deep storm sewer to be maintained in perpetuity by the public. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Is there a particular reason Storm Line 7 is so deep? Evaluate and correct.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
All of the stormwater profile sheets are missing cardinal direction of flowline in and out. Parenthesis as provided, but the field is blank. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Why is Storm Line 6 shown so deep? Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Profile view of Storm Line 3 does not make sense. According to your retention basin plan, you are proposing a ten foot shared-use corridor along the retaining wall, and outside the limits of any flat area at the base of the retaining wall. The profile view does not show this, but rather, a sloped area from the base of the retaining wall to the retention basin. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.301: No cardinal directions for the various storm structure elements were provided for flowline in or flowline out. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Why is Storm Line 9 shown so deep? Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Why is Storm Line 10 shown so deep? Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Storm Line 11 is too deep at the downstream end for no compelling reason. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Storm Line 12 is also shown with excessive depth for no compelling reason, especially on the upstream side. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Recommend reviewing the entire stormwater system, and make adjustments over the entire system. Typical depths of cover for other projects in the City are considerably less than you are showing. Anything greater than 7 feet of cover should be supported by a reason, and I am not seeing the reason at this time. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Street underdrains shall be called-out at all sump locations. The underdrains shall be connected between curb inlets at the sump. Show the location of these underdrains, and provide a reference to the detail showing how these will be installed. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Delete the trenching and backfill detail, and insert the City standard detail GEN-6 for pipe bedding. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Type B ADA-accessible ramps are no longer allowed under PROWAG. ADA-accessible ramps shall be uni-directional rather than bi-directional. In other words, for each pedestrian movement, a separate ADA-accessible ramp is required. Remove all Type B ramps and provide alternate design. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Public Works requested all public streets to be constructed on this project to be KCMMB portland cement concrete mix rather than asphaltic concrete. In a letter dated Jan. 23, 2025 from Cook, Flatt, and Strobel, it is stated that a geotechnical report was completed, and it goes on to recommend asphaltic concrete. Any deviation from the Public Works request shall be approved by Public Works, and so far, the plan does not comply with Public Works request. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Typical pavement sections are shown with asphaltic concrete, not portland cement KCMMB mix. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
No further review of the pavement typical sections was conducted due to discrepancies in what Public Works requested versus what you are proposing. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.100: Why are you showing easements for the private storm lines? Remove the easements as appropriate. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Label the profile views of streets with the word "PRIVATE" or "PUBLIC" as appropriate. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
You are missing the typical pavement sections for the private street segments. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Plans are missing striping plan for crosswalks. Correction required.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Water
|
No Comments
|
03/21/2025
|
03/20/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
1. Sheet C502: The connection point does not appear to have changed because it is still shown on the east side of Jefferson. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C502: There appears to be less than 18” minimum separation. There are other storm crossings near sta. 3+50, 6+60 7+40 and 10+20 not shown in the profile. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.502: The tee at Sta. 2+79 was not changed to a cross. Change this to a cross. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.502: Line 2 was moved south so it is out of the street. The tee at Sta. 10+48.78 needs a corrected station. The 8” valve should be (E). The 12” valve should be (S). Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.502: Line 4 should have 3 valves at the tee. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.503: It is difficult to see the location of the utility easement on this sheet for much of the water main. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.503: The water main is above the storm between Sta. 13+00 and Sta. 14+00. These lines need to be separated. Can a junction box be installed to move the storm closer to the street?
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.503: Add the Strom crossing near Sta. 22+00 to the profile. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.504: Line 3, eliminate the bends at sta 1+53.5 and 1+66.63 and exstend the water main northeast to the bend near sta 4+50. In other words, eliminate the jog. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.504: Label the stationing and bend near sta 4+50. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.504: Change the 8x8 inch tee stationing to match the stationing in line 2. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.505: Add storm crossing near stations 0+15, 3+00, 4+65 and 5+50 to the profile. Add sewer crossing near Sta. 2+50 to the profile. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.504: Label the fitting near Sta. 0+30. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.505: The alignment at 63+34.44 appears to line-up with the Jefferson St. water main. Make the connection with a bend to eliminate the tee and valve. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.505: The segment of pipe on Line 5 is mostly less than 1200 foot radius of curvature from sta 1+00 and up, and thus needs fittings. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
A cost estimate is required prior to formal approval. Informational comment.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
An MDNR construction permit shall be required prior to formal approval of the plans. Informational comment.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Use new City trenching and backfill detail. Remove your version. Correction required.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Traffic Signal
|
No Comments
|
03/21/2025
|
03/20/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
No traffic signal plans submitted. Corrections required.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Streetlight
|
No Comments
|
03/21/2025
|
03/20/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Streetlight plans and traffic signal plans were missing. Correction required.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Traffic Signal
|
Corrections
|
03/21/2025
|
03/18/2025
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Traffic Signal plan were not included with this submittal. Please submit for review. Building Occupancy will not be issued until the signal is in place.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
A lighting plan must be submitted before plans will be approved.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
A detailed Construction phasing plan must be provided before approval. The plan should provide time periods for each closure.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Detailed traffic control plans must be submitted for each phase of construction.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Generally, pavement design is not reviewable as submitted. Please include backup calcs for ESALs, ADT, truck distribution, soil properties. and rational for material coefficient inputs.
Revised Pavement Design was not included.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Truck percentage seems low for this proposed roadway.
Expect truck count to be about 10%, so is this 2% tractor trailers only, which seems okay, but ignores school buses, trash trucks, delivery vehicles, etc.
Revised Pavement Design was not included.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
CBR should be 3.0 unless there are lab tests showing otherwise. Please submit Geotech work and lab testing for review, or change to a CBR of 3.0.
Revised Pavement Design was not included.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Submit PCC pavement recommendation to evaluate life-cycle cost to the City.
Revised Pavement Design was not included.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The Overall Phasing Plan shows Phase 1 extending through December while the Phas One plan shows it through November. Plans should match. Additionally, this is showing a 9 month closure rather than the 6 month cosure as discussed with staff.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please revise the Signing Plan per the marked up sheet sent by staff on 3/7/2025.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please provide a detailed Pavement Marking plan.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please add a special sign on MO 291 and SW 3rd St stating OLDHAM PKWY CLOSED FOILLOW DETOUR.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please specify Iteris Next Video detection system.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The Cable quantities seem low based on a few random checks. Please be sure that you are including the required slack for each length per the LS 5900 design criteria.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The cable from the power supply to the cabinet should be 3c-#2 rather than 1C#10.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The second power line should go straight to the street light disconnet rather than through pull box number one. If this is a double service dosconnet is should be labeled as such.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
In the Cabinet Splice should be Corning Wall-Mountable Interconnect Center rather than Gator Patch.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The Fiber Optic Data Link Switcch should be speced as Cisco, Antaira, Comtrol, or Transition with similar specs.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The Fiber Distribution Unit in a pull box, and outdoor dome enclosure. Typ: Thincol Fiber Optic Splice Enclosure.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
All Fiber should be Single Mode.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streetlight
|
Corrections
|
03/21/2025
|
03/18/2025
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Misc
Street Lights should be included with this submittal. Lighting Standards have been updated but are not yet on the City Website. Staff would be happy to email the new standards upon request. Building occupacy will not be issued until all improvements have been installed.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streets
|
Corrections
|
03/21/2025
|
03/18/2025
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
A traffic phasing plan will need to be included with plans, i.e. how will traffic be handled during construction and any detour routes that may be needed.
This is still not sufficient. You will need to show which roads will be closed when, which closures will be done at the same time and how the local traffic will access their homes. This can not be left to construction but should be worked out now as with any Capital Improvement project within the City.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
All public streets in this development should be KCMMB concrete rather than asphalt. Please revise the profiles to reflect this.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
No Streetlight plans were included with this submission.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
No signal plans were included with this submission.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Sanitary
|
Corrections
|
03/21/2025
|
03/13/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Lot 1 appears to be unserved by sanitary sewer. Response to comments states this lot is to be used for a parking lot and will not need sanitary sewer service, and provides an alternate connection method for a future connection if needed in the future. A letter was submitted by the applicant showing an alternate route for a future sanitary sewer which is: 1) too close to the retaining wall, 2) within the backyard of the homes along this area, a violation of Design and Construction Manual rules, 3) adding an additional potential dam penetration which would not be supported, and 4) would require the installation of approximately 300 feet of aerial gravity line which would be 15 feet high at the highest point in the backyards of residential homes. All of these deficiencies in the concept plan are grounds for rejection of this plan. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.403: 1. There are two (2) instances where sanitary line and storm line are less than 18 inches vertical separation. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Has there been any discussion with City of Lee's Summit Parks Department on the placement of the new sanitary sewer on Park's property? Shared-use path? We have had no discussions with Parks concerning this sanitary sewer line installation. Recommend meeting with Parks. Informational comment.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sanitary sewer is too close to the retaining wall along the entire segment from the dam to the end of the retaining wall to the east. Measurement is taken at the outside of the pipe to the lowest portion of the footing, which would appear to extend an additional 5 feet to the south due to the banter involved and the flat area at the bottom of the retaining wall as depicted in your typical section view. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Restoration plan was not shown for the work within Parks property. A detailed restoration plan shall be required showing the restoration of the baseball diamond impacted by construction, outfield, and any other areas impacted by construction on Parks property. Simple seeding is not sufficient. Recommend sodding in areas outside the playing field, and restoration of the playing field to Parks Department specifications. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Off-site easement(s) shall be required prior to formal approval of any sanitary sewer plans. Easement acquisition shall be subject to Parks board approval. Informational requirement.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Since the retention basin dam and embankment is being moved due to comments related to encroachment onto adjacent property, additional review of the sanitary sewer line shall be performed when the new plan is submitted for the dam and retention pond. This review will be related to conflicts related to dam penetration by the sanitary sewer line, and whether mitigation measures such as re-routing are justified. Informational comment.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.401: 1. Notes are vague concerning the abandonment of the existing manhole located on Clearview Acres Lot 10. For instance, notes say to use a "watertight plug", which is not defined, and do not address remaining backfill, restoration, sodding, seeding, topsoil, mulch, etc. after placing "1/2" clean gravel". 2. The note stating "plug sanitary main outside limits of permanent pool" does not make sense. Clarify what is intended. 3. Recommend removal of a portion of the existing 10 inch sanitary sewer line to eliminate the potential of impacting the pond. Extra penetrations within the dam are not recommended, and the removal of the existing line as appropriate would eliminate one source of "piping".
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sanitary sewer depth is too deep at Sanitary Sewer Line A. You are allowed 20 feet to the flowline, not the top of pipe. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Delete old pipe embedment detail and insert new City standard detail GEN-6. Correction required.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Street and Storm
|
Corrections
|
02/21/2025
|
02/21/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Will the large storm line on the west side of the project encroach-upon the structural portions of the retaining wall? The typical section view for the retaining wall is vague, and it would appear a more thorough design be prepared for a retaining wall of this magnitude. For instance, it is not clear whether the retaining wall will need to be considered as part of the dam design. It is not clear how far the footing of the retaining wall will extend into the subgrade, and how far the flat area on the bottom adjacent grade will extend horizontally, thus affecting the setback from 100 year WSE within the basin, setback from sanitary sewer(s), setback from water line(s), and setback from public storm lines. Evaluation and correction required as appropriate.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Index of Sheets on Cover Page does not match what is shown in the plan set. As one example, the signage plan is not shown in the index. Go through the index of sheets, and ensure the index of sheets matches exactly what is shown in the plans. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Refer to comment #5 in previous applicant letter. Detailing of the ADA-accessible route across intersections was requested, but not provided. All ADA-accessible routes across intersections shall be detailed with width, cross-slope, running slope and location. Particular care shall be taken to ensure ADA-accessible routes across intersections in the stop-controlled condition are less than 1.5% cross-slope, 5 foot minimum width. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
It is not possible to review the ADA-accessbile ramps and ADA-accessible routes without traffic signal plans at Oldham and Fieldhouse, and the streetlight plans. No further review at these locations were conducted. Informational comment.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Submittal was still missing the streetlight plans. No further review of the road geometry was conducted along the area in question. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Refer to comment #6 in previous applicant letter. Signage plan is still missing. It is not possible to perform a full review without the signage plan, as it makes the review of stop-controlled intersections difficult. Provide a signage plan for the resubmittal. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
No phasing plan was submitted. This has been requested on several occasions, but nothing has been officially submitted with the plans. A specific phasing plan shall be required, and shall be a part of the construction plans. Informal verbal agreements are not sufficient for a phasing plan. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
How are you managing the existing storm line adjacent to Lot 204 Hillsdale? Are you proposing to remove this storm line? What are you planning in terms of an end treatment of this line? Are you proposing any sort of inlet at the end? Evaluate and correct as appropriate.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Refer to comment #22 in previous applicant letter. Rip rap design and dimension callouts and material callouts were requested, but the response to comments stated it is still "added", but I can find no calculations. No further review was conducted. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
According to the plan view and the typical section view of the retaining wall, you are proposing to allow sheetflow of stormwater over the tops and sides of the retaining wall. Grading should be revised to direct stormwater to the field inlets and storm lines serving this project. Sheetflow and/or concentrated flow shall not be allowed to cascade over the retaining wall. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Refer to comment #25 in previous applicant letter. None of the typical sections provided for this project in regard to street construction is sufficient for arterial streets. The Design and Construction Manual requires the design to be completed with the aid of a geotechnical report based on actual sampling and based on Section 5203.11 of the Design and Construction Manual. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Refer to comment #25 in the previous applicant letter. In addition to a engineered design of the pavement based on a geotechnical report, all pavements shall include either chemically-stabilized subgrade or geogrid in the design of the base layer. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Regardless of the design of the arterial street pavement sections, the asphaltic concrete or portland cement concrete sections shall be KCMMB mix. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.301: Footing of the retaining wall over the 48 inch storm line does not appear to show the footing. It appears the bottom of the wall is called-out, not the bottom of the footing. It appears the retaining wall will be using the pipe as structural support due to the minimal distance between the footing of the retaining wall and the outside of the HDPE pipe. It would appear the pipe beneath the retaining wall should be upgraded to RCP at a minimum. Evaluation and correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Inlet 2-1 to 1-5 storm line should be private, not public. Change the label of field inlet 2-1 to private. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Are you proposing a straight cantilever retaining wall with no banter? Informational comment?
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Go through the plans and correct north arrows that are not correct. I found instances where the north arrow was not aligned correctly. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.211: Why are you showing the retention basin and dam within this plan set? In addition, why does this version on Sheet C.211 vary from the other version contained in the retention basin and grading plan? Grading is different, among other issues. Suggest removing any of these separate plans from this particular plan set. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.301: No cardinal directions or number of openings was provided for the field inlets. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.301: No cardinal directions for the various storm structure elements were provided for flowline in or flowline out. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.302: No cardinal directions or number of openings was provided for the field inlets. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.302: No cardinal directions for the various storm structure elements were provided for flowline in or flowline out. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.302: Why construct two (2) separate storm lines to the detention basin? Wouldn't it be easier to connect Line 3 serving the curb inlet (erroneously shown on the profile as a field inlet, and erroneously labeled as 3-2 even though it appears to be curb inlet 3-1) to the larger system to the west? Evaluate and correct.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.301: What is the reasoning behind the excessive storm line slope to the retention basin? A 10% slope may lead to issues within the retention basin, and good engineering judgment would cause me to question such a design, especially given the proximity to a tall retaining wall. Evaluate and correct.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
"PUBLIC" versus "PRIVATE" has been requested on the profile view of storm lines, but remains unresolved. Go through the plans and label each profile view of the storm line as "PRIVATE" or "PUBLIC" as appropriate. This is needed to enable our GIS technicians to enter the data for our GIS system. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Overall Layout: Storm line 11 is shown too close to the retaining wall near the retention basin. Retaining wall shall be installed outside the limits of the easement, including any foundation, geogrid tie-backs, drainage system, or other item ancilary to the retaining wall. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Field inlet sizing (i.e., dimensions) on Storm Line 1 is called-out incorrectly (e.g., 4x4) on the plan view versus what is shown on the profile view. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.303: Incoming crown of pipe is shown below receiving crown of pipe on one (1) segment. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Is there a particular reason Storm Line 5 is shown so deep? There does not seem to be any compelling reason to allow such a deep storm sewer to be maintained in perpetuity by the public. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Is there a particular reason Storm Line 7 is so deep? Evaluate and correct.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
All of the stormwater profile sheets are missing cardinal direction of flowline in and out. Parenthesis as provided, but the field is blank. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Why is Storm Line 6 shown so deep? Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Profile view of Storm Line 3 does not make sense. According to your retention basin plan, you are proposing a ten foot shared-use corridor along the retaining wall, and outside the limits of any flat area at the base of the retaining wall. The profile view does not show this, but rather, a sloped area from the base of the retaining wall to the retention basin. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.301: No cardinal directions for the various storm structure elements were provided for flowline in or flowline out. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Why is Storm Line 9 shown so deep? Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Why is Storm Line 10 shown so deep? Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Storm Line 11 is too deep at the downstream end for no compelling reason. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Storm Line 12 is also shown with excessive depth for no compelling reason, especially on the upstream side. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Recommend reviewing the entire stormwater system, and make adjustments over the entire system. Typical depths of cover for other projects in the City are considerably less than you are showing. Anything greater than 7 feet of cover should be supported by a reason, and I am not seeing the reason at this time. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Street underdrains shall be called-out at all sump locations. The underdrains shall be connected between curb inlets at the sump. Show the location of these underdrains, and provide a reference to the detail showing how these will be installed. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Delete the trenching and backfill detail, and insert the City standard detail GEN-6 for pipe bedding. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Type B ADA-accessible ramps are no longer allowed under PROWAG. ADA-accessible ramps shall be uni-directional rather than bi-directional. In other words, for each pedestrian movement, a separate ADA-accessible ramp is required. Remove all Type B ramps and provide alternate design. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Public Works requested all public streets to be constructed on this project to be KCMMB portland cement concrete mix rather than asphaltic concrete. In a letter dated Jan. 23, 2025 from Cook, Flatt, and Strobel, it is stated that a geotechnical report was completed, and it goes on to recommend asphaltic concrete. Any deviation from the Public Works request shall be approved by Public Works, and so far, the plan does not comply with Public Works request. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Typical pavement sections are shown with asphaltic concrete, not portland cement KCMMB mix. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
No further review of the pavement typical sections was conducted due to discrepancies in what Public Works requested versus what you are proposing. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.100: Why are you showing easements for the private storm lines? Remove the easements as appropriate. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Label the profile views of streets with the word "PRIVATE" or "PUBLIC" as appropriate. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
You are missing the typical pavement sections for the private street segments. Correction required.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Sanitary
|
Corrections
|
02/21/2025
|
02/21/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Lot 1 appears to be unserved by sanitary sewer. Response to comments states this lot is to be used for a parking lot and will not need sanitary sewer service, and provides an alternate connection method for a future connection if needed in the future. A letter was submitted by the applicant showing an alternate route for a future sanitary sewer which is: 1) too close to the retaining wall, 2) within the backyard of the homes along this area, a violation of Design and Construction Manual rules, 3) adding an additional potential dam penetration which would not be supported, and 4) would require the installation of approximately 300 feet of aerial gravity line which would be 15 feet high at the highest point in the backyards of residential homes. All of these deficiencies in the concept plan are grounds for rejection of this plan. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Move manhole B-1 outside the limits of the intersection. Place it outside the limits of the wheeltrack area. The main issue is the manhole is still shown within the limits of the intersection, and needs to be moved. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Comment: "Utility crossings are not shown in profiles". Although this comment was addressed, there are at least six (6) instances of utility conflicts either due to pipe shown going through another pipe, or too close to another pipe. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Manhole A-5 is shown below finish grade on Sheet C.404. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Has there been any discussion with City of Lee's Summit Parks Department on the placement of the new sanitary sewer on Park's property? Shared-use path? We have had no discussions with Parks concerning this sanitary sewer line installation. Recommend meeting with Parks. Informational comment.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sanitary sewer is too close to the retaining wall along the entire segment from the dam to the end of the retaining wall to the east. Measurement is taken at the outside of the pipe to the lowest portion of the footing, which would appear to extend an additional 5 feet to the south due to the banter involved and the flat area at the bottom of the retaining wall as depicted in your typical section view. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Restoration plan was not shown for the work within Parks property. A detailed restoration plan shall be required showing the restoration of the baseball diamond impacted by construction, outfield, and any other areas impacted by construction on Parks property. Simple seeding is not sufficient. Recommend sodding in areas outside the playing field, and restoration of the playing field to Parks Department specifications. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Off-site easement(s) shall be required prior to formal approval of any sanitary sewer plans. Easement acquisition shall be subject to Parks board approval. Informational requirement.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Since the retention basin dam and embankment is being moved due to comments related to encroachment onto adjacent property, additional review of the sanitary sewer line shall be performed when the new plan is submitted for the dam and retention pond. This review will be related to conflicts related to dam penetration by the sanitary sewer line, and whether mitigation measures such as re-routing are justified. Informational comment.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Plan does not provide any details concerning the existing 10 inch sanitary sewer line beneath the proposed retention basin, and how this line will be properly abandoned. I would suggest the majority of this line be physically removed, with portions allowed to be abandoned in place where it makes sense. Abandonment in place for those areas shall be described on the plans, and the method for abandonment in place shall be shown on the plans and shall conform to the Design and Construction Manual. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sanitary sewer depth is too deep at Sanitary Sewer Line A. You are allowed 20 feet to the flowline, not the top of pipe. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Delete old pipe embedment detail and insert new City standard detail GEN-6. Correction required.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Traffic Signal
|
Corrections
|
02/21/2025
|
02/21/2025
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Traffic Signal plan were not included with this submittal. Please submit for review. Building Occupancy will not be issued until the signal is in place.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
A lighting plan must be submitted before plans will be approved.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
A detailed Construction phasing plan must be provided before approval. The plan should provide time periods for each closure.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Detailed traffic control plans must be submitted for each phase of construction.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Generally, pavement design is not reviewable as submitted. Please include backup calcs for ESALs, ADT, truck distribution, soil properties. and rational for material coefficient inputs.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Truck percentage seems low for this proposed roadway.
Expect truck count to be about 10%, so is this 2% tractor trailers only, which seems okay, but ignores school buses, trash trucks, delivery vehicles, etc.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
CBR should be 3.0 unless there are lab tests showing otherwise. Please submit Geotech work and lab testing for review, or change to a CBR of 3.0.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Submit PCC pavement recommendation to evaluate life-cycle cost to the City.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streets
|
Corrections
|
02/21/2025
|
02/21/2025
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Misc
The sidewalk along the south/west side of Oldham from Jefferson to the fieldhouse should be a 10 FT multi-use path. Please change.
The 10 FT multi-use use is not consistently shown on all sheets. Specifically the Plan and Profile sheet for Oldham still shows a 5 Ft sidewalk. Additionally the Profiles need to be updated and the reference should be for a muli-use or Shared use path as the design is different from that of a sidewalk.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Plans should include demo of the driveway at the church property.
If the church drive is not being removed with these plans, please add a note to the plans that the north most entrance to the site should not be built until the church parking lot is build and the existing church drive is removed.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
A traffic phasing plan will need to be included with plans, i.e. how will traffic be handled during construction and any detour routes that may be needed.
This is still not sufficient. You will need to show which roads will be closed when, which closures will be done at the same time and how the local traffic will access their homes. This can not be left to construction but should be worked out now as with any Capital Improvement project within the City.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
The east/west leg of the intersection at Oldham and Fieldhouse should be named SW Fieldhouse Drive on both sides of Oldham. There can not be two intersection streets with the same name. The north/south leg of the "seven street" can remain SW Jefferson Street.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
The sag vertical curve on Oldham Pkwy at Low PT Sta. 11+57.28 has a K Value below the minimum required of 49. Please adjust to as close to the minimum as possible.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
There are some misc. notes at the bottom of the profiles that need to be cleaned up.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
All public streets in this development should be KCMMB concrete rather than asphalt. Please revise the profiles to reflect this.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
No Streetlight plans were included with this submission.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
No signal plans were included with this submission.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streetlight
|
Corrections
|
02/21/2025
|
02/21/2025
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Misc
Corrective Action Required
Street Lights should be included with this submittal. Lighting Standards have been updated but are not yet on the City Website. Staff would be happy to email the new standards upon request. Building occupacy will not be issued until all improvements have been installed.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Streetlight
|
Corrections
|
02/21/2025
|
02/21/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Streetlight plans and traffic signal plans were missing. Correction required.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Traffic Signal
|
Corrections
|
02/21/2025
|
02/21/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
No traffic signal plans submitted. Corrections required.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Water
|
Corrections
|
02/21/2025
|
02/21/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
1. Sheet C502: The connection point does not appear to have changed because it is still shown on the east side of Jefferson. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C502: There appears to be less than 18” minimum separation. There are other storm crossings near sta. 3+50, 6+60 7+40 and 10+20 not shown in the profile. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.502: The tee at Sta. 2+79 was not changed to a cross. Change this to a cross. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.502: Line 2 was moved south so it is out of the street. The tee at Sta. 10+48.78 needs a corrected station. The 8” valve should be (E). The 12” valve should be (S). Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.502: Line 4 should have 3 valves at the tee. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.503: It is difficult to see the location of the utility easement on this sheet for much of the water main. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.503: The water main is above the storm between Sta. 13+00 and Sta. 14+00. These lines need to be separated. Can a junction box be installed to move the storm closer to the street?
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.503: Add the Strom crossing near Sta. 22+00 to the profile. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.504: Line 3, eliminate the bends at sta 1+53.5 and 1+66.63 and exstend the water main northeast to the bend near sta 4+50. In other words, eliminate the jog. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.504: Label the stationing and bend near sta 4+50. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.504: Change the 8x8 inch tee stationing to match the stationing in line 2. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.505: Add storm crossing near stations 0+15, 3+00, 4+65 and 5+50 to the profile. Add sewer crossing near Sta. 2+50 to the profile. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.504: Label the fitting near Sta. 0+30. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.505: The alignment at 63+34.44 appears to line-up with the Jefferson St. water main. Make the connection with a bend to eliminate the tee and valve. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.505: The segment of pipe on Line 5 is mostly less than 1200 foot radius of curvature from sta 1+00 and up, and thus needs fittings. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
A cost estimate is required prior to formal approval. Informational comment.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
An MDNR construction permit shall be required prior to formal approval of the plans. Informational comment.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Use new City trenching and backfill detail. Remove your version. Correction required.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Sanitary
|
Corrections
|
01/03/2025
|
01/07/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
The north arrow is wrong on Sheet C-401. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Existing manholes are not labeled, or any manholes on Sheet C-401. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.402: Two (2) manholes are shown below finish grade. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C.402: Scale is incorrect. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Where is the retaining wall(s) in relation to the sanitary sewer? Show on plan view and any relevant profile views where there are potential conflicts. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Lot 1 appears to be unserved by sanitary sewer. Response to comments states this lot is to be used for a parking lot, but this cannot be guaranteed if a new owner purchases this lot. Sanitary sewer service should be extended to serve Lot 1. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Move manhole B-1 outside the limits of the intersection. Place it outside the limits of the wheeltrack area. The main issue is the manhole is still shown within the limits of the intersection, and needs to be moved. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Move manhole A-3 outside the limits of the intersection. Place it outside the limits of the wheeltrack area. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Move manhole A-5 outside the limits of the intersection. Place it outside the limits of the wheeltrack area. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Center manhole B-3 better so it does not interfere with the wheeltrack. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Utility crossings are not shown in profiles. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Manhole A-2 station 7+00: Raise MH A-2 above grade. I’m concerned that it will be buried in the future due to being located in the middle of a steep incline like that. Maybe raise it 2-3 feet above grade. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Manhole C-2 is shown below finish grade. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Manhole A-5 is shown below finish grade on Sheet C.404. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Manhole C-4 is shown below finish grade. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
No notes provided on plan view for placement of "Manhole in Paved Area Detail". The notation shall include a reference to the sheet number and detail number for the "Manhole in Paved Area Detail" in accordance with recognized drafting standards. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Plans are missing standard detail for wye connection and tracer wire installation. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sanitary sewer line A is too deep near manhole A-2. Maximum depth to flowline is 20 feet. It appears to be 25 feet in some cases along the line (i.e., upstream of A-2). Correction required, possibly with a drop manhole.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Has there been any discussion with City of Lee's Summit Parks Department on the placement of the new sanitary sewer on Park's property? Shared-use path? We have had no discussions with Parks concerning this sanitary sewer line installation. Recommend meeting with Parks. Informational comment.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
You are showing a 15 inch sanitary sewer connecting to existing sanitary sewer manhole 38-248. Manhole 38-248 appears to be connected a 10 inch line downstream, but is neither labeled nor scaled correctly. Label the existing line, and scale it properly for the existing condition. Provide a note stating "existing line downstream of 38-248 to be upsized at a later date" or equivalent language. Recommend raising the incoming line slightly to account for any future issues with downstream line sizing. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Estimate required prior to formal approval. Informational comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Water
|
Corrections
|
01/03/2025
|
01/07/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
1. Sheet C502: The connection point does not appear to have changed because it is still shown on the east side of Jefferson. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C502: There appears to be less than 18” minimum separation. There are other storm crossings near sta. 3+50, 6+60 7+40 and 10+20 not shown in the profile. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.502: The tee at Sta. 2+79 was not changed to a cross. Change this to a cross. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.502: Line 2 was moved south so it is out of the street. The tee at Sta. 10+48.78 needs a corrected station. The 8” valve should be (E). The 12” valve should be (S). Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.502: Line 4 should have 3 valves at the tee. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.503: It is difficult to see the location of the utility easement on this sheet for much of the water main. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.503: The water main is above the storm between Sta. 13+00 and Sta. 14+00. These lines need to be separated. Can a junction box be installed to move the storm closer to the street?
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.503: Add the Strom crossing near Sta. 22+00 to the profile. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.504: Line 3, eliminate the bends at sta 1+53.5 and 1+66.63 and exstend the water main northeast to the bend near sta 4+50. In other words, eliminate the jog. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.504: Label the stationing and bend near sta 4+50. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.504: Change the 8x8 inch tee stationing to match the stationing in line 2. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.505: Add storm crossing near stations 0+15, 3+00, 4+65 and 5+50 to the profile. Add sewer crossing near Sta. 2+50 to the profile. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.504: Label the fitting near Sta. 0+30. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.505: The alignment at 63+34.44 appears to line-up with the Jefferson St. water main. Make the connection with a bend to eliminate the tee and valve. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.505: The segment of pipe on Line 5 is mostly less than 1200 foot radius of curvature from sta 1+00 and up, and thus needs fittings. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
A cost estimate is required prior to formal approval. Informational comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Traffic Signal
|
Corrections
|
01/03/2025
|
01/07/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
No traffic signal plans submitted. Corrections required.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Street and Storm
|
Corrections
|
01/03/2025
|
01/07/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Refer to comment #1 in previous applicant letter. Sheet C.220: Scale is incorrect. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Refer to comment #4 in previous applicant letter. Details for the ADA-accessible ramps were requested, but the response only indentified a standard detail on Sheet C.601 which is not adequate. All ADA-accessible ramps shall be designed and detailed for each case. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Refer to comment #5 in previous applicant letter. Detailing of the ADA-accessible route across intersections was requested, but not provided. All ADA-accessible routes across intersections shall be detailed with width, cross-slope, running slope and location. Particular care shall be taken to ensure ADA-accessible routes across intersections in the stop-controlled condition are less than 1.5% cross-slope, 5 foot minimum width. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Index on cover sheet does not match the order or naming of the plans contained within the plan set. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.211 Detail 4: The ADA-accessible route shown at this location does not line-up with the north side of the street. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Refer to comment #6 in previous applicant letter. Signage plan is still missing. It is not possible to perform a full review without the signage plan, as it makes the review of stop-controlled intersections difficult. Provide a signage plan for the resubmittal. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Refer to comment #17 in previous applicant letter. A design for the 10 foot shared-use path was requested, but only a schematic was provided on Sheet C.100. This is not sufficient for design of the shared-use path. A complete design is required, including plan, profile, and typical section view. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Refer to comment #19 in previous applicant letter. A drainage table and drainage area map was requested, but was not submitted within the plans. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Refer to comment #22 in previous applicant letter. Rip rap design and dimension callouts and material callouts were requested, but the response to comments stated it is still "under design". No further review was conducted. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.301: There is still a smaller 36 inch pipe entering a larger 48 inch pipe below the crown of the 48 inch pipe. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Refer to comment #25 in previous applicant letter. None of the typical sections provided for this project in regard to street construction is sufficient for arterial streets. The Design and Construction Manual requires the design to be completed with the aid of a geotechnical report based on actual sampling and based on Section 5203.11 of the Design and Construction Manual. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Refer to comment #25 in the previous applicant letter. In addition to a engineered design of the pavement based on a geotechnical report, all pavements shall include either chemically-stabilized subgrade or geogrid in the design of the base layer. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Regardless of the design of the arterial street pavement sections, the asphaltic concrete or portland cement concrete sections shall be KCMMB mix. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
It is difficult to determine how the 10 foot shared-use path can be constructed in a way that complies with ADA. For instance, the schematic view of the shared-use path shows the path ends at the top of the retaining wall. How will the path connect to the park? Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Inlet 2-1 to 1-5 storm line should be private, not public. Change the label of field inlet 2-1 to private. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Are you proposing a straight cantilever retaining wall with no banter? Informational comment?
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Go through the plans and correct north arrows that are not correct. I found instances where the north arrow was not aligned correctly. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Cost estimate required prior to formal approval. Informational comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Streetlight
|
Corrections
|
01/03/2025
|
01/07/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Streetlight plans and traffic signal plans were missing. Correction required.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Traffic Signal
|
Corrections
|
12/24/2024
|
12/23/2024
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Traffic Signal plan were not included with this submittal. Please submit for review. Building Occupancy will not be issued until the signal is in place.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streetlight
|
Corrections
|
12/24/2024
|
12/23/2024
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Misc
Corrective Action Required
Street Lights should be included with this submittal. Lighting Standards have been updated but are not yet on the City Website. Staff would be happy to email the new standards upon request. Building occupacy will not be issued until all improvements have been installed.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streets
|
Corrections
|
12/24/2024
|
12/23/2024
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Misc
The sidewalk along the south/west side of Oldham from Jefferson to the fieldhouse should be a 10 FT multi-use path. Please change.
The 10 FT multi-use use is not consistently shown on all sheets. Specifically the Plan and Profile sheet for Oldham still shows a 5 Ft sidewalk. Additionally the Profiles need to be updated and the reference should be for a muli-use or Shared use path as the design is different from that of a sidewalk.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Plans should include demo of the driveway at the church property.
If the church drive is not being removed with these plans, please add a note to the plans that the north most entrance to the site should not be built until the church parking lot is build and the existing church drive is removed.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
A traffic phasing plan will need to be included with plans, i.e. how will traffic be handled during construction and any detour routes that may be needed.
This is still not sufficient. You will need to show which roads will be closed when, which closures will be done at the same time and how the local traffic will access their homes. This can not be left to construction but should be worked out now as with any Capital Improvement project within the City.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The east/west leg of the intersection at Oldham and Fieldhouse should be named SW Fieldhouse Drive on both sides of Oldham. There can not be two intersection streets with the same name. The north/south leg of the "seven street" can remain SW Jefferson Street.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The sag vertical curve on Oldham Pkwy at Low PT Sta. 11+57.28 has a K Value below the minimum required of 49. Please adjust to as close to the minimum as possible.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
There are some misc. notes at the bottom of the profiles that need to be cleaned up.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
All oublic streets in this development should be concrete rather than asphalt. Please revise the profiles to reflect this.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
No Streetlight plans were included with this submission.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
No signal plans were included with this submission.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Water
|
Corrections
|
11/25/2024
|
11/25/2024
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
1. Sheet C502:
a. Connect to the existing 12” water main near Sta. 0+70. Add a note to abandon or remove the existing 12” water main to the north.
b. Show storm crossing in the profile near Sta. 2+75. Add pipe crossings to the profiles in all plan sheets.
c. Call out the fitting south of Sta. 2+89.61. Call out fittings in all plan sheets.
d. At Sta. 2+89.61, There should be a 12”X12” cross installed here with a 12”X8” reducer on the north side of the cross. Four valves are needed at crosses and three valves are needed at tees which applies to all plan sheets.
e. The Water main looks like it has a radius less than 1146’. Add bends to the water main. This applies to all plan sheets.
f. What is planned between Sta. 7+00 and 8+00? Label the bends in the water main where radius of curvature is less than 1200 feet.
g. hydrant spacing might be too far south of Sta. 8+84.31.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 503: The note “EX. 8” WATER LINE” is incorrect. The existing water main is 12”. Add a note stating to abandon or remove the water main.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
3. Sheet C504:
a. Line 2: Do not install the water main under the street. Do not install a hydrant across the street from the water main.
b. Line 3:
i. Install the water main east of the curb inlet near Sta. 2+50, not under the curb. Where is the right of way or easement line? Please label.
ii. Move the cross at Sta. 0+00 away from the curb so the valves won’t be in the street.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
4. Sheet C505: Abandon or remove the existing 12” water main east of Line 5. Add a note stating what will be done. The tee and valves near the beginning of Line 1 on the east side of Jefferson need to be removed and replaced with 12” pipe.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Show all easements on the plans, and ensure they match with what is shown on the Final Plat. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
General Layout Sheet: Label the line numbers and water line sizes. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Estimate required prior to formal approval. Informational comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Sanitary
|
Corrections
|
11/25/2024
|
11/25/2024
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The north arrow is wrong on Sheet C-401. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Existing manholes are not labeled, or any manholes on Sheet C-401. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.402: Two (2) manholes are shown below finish grade. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.402: Scale is incorrect. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Where is the retaining wall(s) in relation to the sanitary sewer? Show on plan view and any relevant profile views where there are potential conflicts. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Lot 1 appears to be unserved by sanitary sewer. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Move manhole B-1 outside the limits of the intersection. Place it outside the limits of the wheeltrack area. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Move manhole A-3 outside the limits of the intersection. Place it outside the limits of the wheeltrack area. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Move manhole A-5 outside the limits of the intersection. Place it outside the limits of the wheeltrack area. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Center manhole B-3 better so it does not interfere with the wheeltrack. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Utility crossings are not shown in profiles. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Manhole A-2 station 7+00: Raise MH A-2 above grade. I’m concerned that it will be buried in the future due to being located in the middle of a steep incline like that. Maybe raise it 2-3 feet above grade. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Manhole C-2 is shown below finish grade. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Manhole A-5 is shown below finish grade. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Manhole C-4 is shown below finish grade. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
No notes provided on plan view for placement of "Manhole in Paved Area Detail". The notation shall include a reference to the sheet number and detail number for the "Manhole in Paved Area Detail" in accordance with recognized drafting standards. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Plans are missing standard detail for wye connection and tracer wire installation. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sanitary sewer line A is too deep near manhole A-2. Maximum depth to flowline is 20 feet. It appears to be 25 feet in some cases along the line (i.e., upstream of A-2). Correction required, possibly with a drop manhole.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Has there been any discussion with City of Lee's Summit Parks Department on the placement of the new sanitary sewer on Park's property? Shared-use path? We have had no discussions with Parks concerning this sanitary sewer line installation. Recommend meeting with Parks. Informational comment.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
You are showing a 15 inch sanitary sewer connecting to existing sanitary sewer manhole 38-248. Manhole 38-248 appears to be connected a 10 inch line downstream, but is neither labeled nor scaled correctly. Label the existing line, and scale it properly for the existing condition. Provide a note stating "existing line downstream of 38-248 to be upsized at a later date" or equivalent language. Recommend raising the incoming line slightly to account for any future issues with downstream line sizing. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Estimate required prior to formal approval. Informational comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Traffic Signal
|
Corrections
|
11/25/2024
|
11/25/2024
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
No traffic signal plans submitted. Corrections required.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Street and Storm
|
Corrections
|
11/25/2024
|
11/25/2024
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
See streetlight plans for street and storm comments.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Streetlight
|
Corrections
|
11/25/2024
|
11/25/2024
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.200: Scale appears to be incorrect. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
A rendering of the retaining wall should be provided. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
3:1 slope appears to be exceeded on the grading plan in the detention basin. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Plans are missing the ADA-accessible ramp details. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Plans are missing the ADA-accessible route details across intersections. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Signing plan was missing. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Standard details for inlets was missing. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Standard details for trenching and backfill were missing. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Retaining wall should be labeled and shown on the plan view of all relevant sheets. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Retaining wall shall be shown on the profile view of the storm lines of all relevant sheets. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Public storm line is shown beneath a retaining wall, which is not allowed. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Public storm line 100 is too deep near the detention basin. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.301: A pipe is shown entering a larger pipe below the crown. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Rendering of the retaining wall should be presented for all sides of the retaining wall, and include in a general sense, the height of the retaining wall in relation to adjacent property. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
There are numerous stikeovers throughout the plans. Corrections required to ensure the strikeovers are removed.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Preliminary Development Plan showed no retaining walls. It appears there will be very high retaining walls constructed along the backs of properties, and another running east/west. These retaining walls were not considered as part of the Preliminary Development Plan in terms of the adjacent property owners, and hence, it may need to go back through the process of public hearing. Informational comment.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
A shared access was shown on the Preliminary Development Plan. I did not see any shared access pathway on the plans. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
HGL for design storm, including labels for the design storm, were missing on the profile view. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Drainage tables and drainage area maps were missing. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.303: A pipe is shown entering into a larger pipe below the crown. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.303: The right side of the profile view appears to be missing. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Rip rap dimensions are missing. All relevant dimensions, materials, depths, and calculations are required. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.304: Pipe slopes are missing. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
All pipes below collector streets (i.e., Oldham and Jefferson St.) shall be either RCP or CPP. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Typical section views including stationing missing from all street sections. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Streetlight plans and traffic signal plans were missing. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.307: A pipe is shown entering a larger pipe below the crown. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.308: Curb inlet 12-3 is shown out of the ground. Correction required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Ten (10) foot shared use path typical section is required. Corrections required.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Cost estimate required prior to formal approval. Informational comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Traffic Signal
|
Corrections
|
11/13/2024
|
11/04/2024
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Traffic Signal plan were not included with this submittal. Please submit for review. Building Occupancy will not be issued until the signal is in place.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streetlight
|
Corrections
|
11/13/2024
|
11/04/2024
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Misc
Corrective Action Required
Street Lights should be included with this submittal. Lighting Standards have been updated but are not yet on the City Website. Staff would be happy to email the new standards upon request. Building occupacy will not be issued until all improvements have been installed.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streets
|
Corrections
|
11/13/2024
|
11/04/2024
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Misc
Corrective Action Required
The sidewalk along the south/west side of Oldham from Jefferson to the fieldhouse should be a 10 FT multi-use path. Please change.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Plans should include demo of the driveway at the church property.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
A traffic phasing plan will need to be included with plans, i.e. how will traffic be handled during construction and any detour routes that may be needed.
|
|
|
|
