Lee's Summit

The materials do not appear to match what was requested (i.e., we had requested a match to what exists near the Arcade Alley/Stanley Event Center). Did you perform a site visit as requested, to determine how and what was consructed at that location?

Brick pavers will be disturbed during installation of any system to fix the drainage problem. Where is the detail showing how the brick pavers will be restored, including the concrete subgrade? Please refer to the standard drawing contained elsewhere within the previously-approved plan set for this detail.

General comment about trench drain concept: The intent of the design should be to collect stormwater that backs up against the sidewalk, correct? As such, no slotted trench drain system is needed or desired by the City. Again, please see examples in the downtown which address this sort of issue. The cast iron covers over the trenches have no slots, and hence, are merely there to provide a suitable surface over the trench.

Please verify whether pipes exist beneath the trench drains in the downtown area, when performing your field survey. If they exist, please incorporate into the design.

Open yard trees and shrubs are required. Please provide 1 additional tree and 2 additional bushes to meet the minimum landscaping requirements.

DE Engineers Estimate

The Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Costs should be revised. It appears the asphalt paving, subgrade, and geogrid was based on an extremely high area calculation. Perhaps not divided by 9 sq. ft/sq. yd.?

DE Engineers Estimate

The Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Costs was missing the following items: 1) sanitary sewer line abandonment, 2) sanitary sewer manhole removal, 3) sanitary sewer manhole abandonment, 4) subgrade design, including 4 inch thick PCC underlayment beneath pavers, sanding, drainage features, 5) sanitary sewer wye connections and tracer wire, 6) water line valves.

DE Contact Field Eng. Inspector

Contact Field Engineering Inspections at (816) 969-1200 at least 48 hours prior to the onset of construction.

DE Contact ROW Inspector

Prior to any activities within the right-of-way that are not directly associated with a specific infrastructure or building permit, a separate right-of-way permit may be required. Contact a Right-of-Way Inspector at (816) 969-1800 to obtain the required permit.

DE Future Repair Work

Please be aware that any future repair work to public infrastructure (e.g., water main repair, sanitary sewer repair, storm sewer repair, etc.) within public easements will not necessarily include the repair of pavement, curbing, landscaping, or other private improvements which are located within the easement.

DE C&O #12 Cut & Fill

Any cut and / or fill operations, which cause public infrastructure to exceed the maximum / minimum depths of cover shall be mitigated by relocating the infrastructure vertically and / or horizontally to meet the specifications contained within the City’s Design and Construction Manual.

The private storm line #1, and the public storm line shown on the separate public stormwater and water line plans must be substantially complete, prior to any portion of the building or foundation creating the potential for flooding adjacent buildings or properties.

Code Statement

All issues pertaining to life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures and premises, and to the safety to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations, shall be in accordance with the 2018 International Fire Code.

Code Statement

All issues pertaining to life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures and premises, and to the safety to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations, shall be in accordance with the 2018 International Fire Code.

Fire Lanes

IFC 503.2.1 - Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (6096 mm), exclusive of shoulders, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (4115 mm) The fire lane and alley shall be unobstructed by power poles or guide wires.

EIFS is not an approved material in the CBD district. Please replace this with an acceptable building material. The design standards prohibit the material wholesale.

Please see applicant letter dated June 14, 2019. Comment #2 discussed the non-existent detail for abandonment of sanitary sewer line in-place on Sheet C.010. We are still not seeing any detail for sanitary sewer line abandonment in-place. A detail is provided for a manhole abandonment in-place, but nothing is provided for sanitary sewer line abandonment in-place.

Please see comment #6 from the applicant letter dated June 14, 2019. Cross-sections are provided, but the cross section B-B on Detail 2 does not appear to match what is shown on the plan view. The plan view calls-out 1.5%, but the cross-section B-B calls-out 1.0%. Please reconcile.

Please see comment #9 of the applicant letter dated June 14, 2019. Sheet C.300 calls-out what we had previously assumed was a curb inlet. However, it is now called-out as a grated inlet referenced on Sheet C.601. Sheet C.301 provides further details for this grated inlet by stating "4x4 grate inlet 1-5, but the profile view calls-out a 3x3 grate inlet for 1-5. Further, when looking at the details shown on Sheet C.601, no such dimensions are possible. Only a double grate with an inside dimension of 2 feet by 2.25 feet is given, and a single grate inlet with inside dimensions of 1 foot by 2 feet is given. The bigger question may be, "is a grated inlet appropriate for this location". This was the assumption in previous comments, although never specifically stated.

Please refer to comment #10 of the previous applicant letter dated June 14, 2019. An estimate of the deflection of the storm line is required, and should be drawn on the plans. Consideration must be given to the fact this storm line is 15 inches inside diameter, with additional wall thickness. This will not only affect the plans showing the location of the storm line, but also, the brick paver removal and replacement.

Please see above comment, and ensure that the brick paver removal and replacement is adjusted as needed to account for the estimated amount of deflection in the 15 inch storm line.

During the meeting on June 17, 2019, an alternate private pipe type was discussed. We are still seeing HDPE in the plans. Are you still wanting to use HDPE?

Sheet C.301: You are showing RCP on the public storm line on the profile view. Please change to CPP to match what is shown in the public plans.

Sheet C.301: According to your profile view, the grated inlet is located at the high point of the proposed grade. Is this going to work? Is a sump going to be constructed at this location to collect all stormwater?

A revised Engineer's Estimate is required which addresses the above comments. Additional brick paver removal and replacement should be shown, and any other changes to the storm lines or storm structures.

Code Statement

All issues pertaining to life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures and premises, and to the safety to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations, shall be in accordance with the 2012 International Fire Code.

Fire Lanes

IFC 503.2.1 - Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (6096 mm), exclusive of shoulders, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (4115 mm) The fire lane and alley shall be unobstructed by power poles or guide wires.

Plans call out radii for curb at the alley intersection of Market and other improvement references that don't exist. The start of proposed curb construction and type is not labeled along Market.

The revised alley entrance from Market shows a 5' curb transition from CG-1 to Flat Curb, but CG-1 isn't proposed on the south side with a curb return. Mislabeled. The transition from flat pavement to CG-1 is not labeled or diminsioned on the north side of the alley near Market.

Sidewalk along Market and at Main is not adequately dimensioned on the plans for construction (e.g. where's the PI referenced to?)

North-South Alley will be signed by City One-Way (southbound) upon City approval of such condition.

Domestic water system design incomplete. Provide the following: - Specify all water pipe materials 4/15/19 - not addressed 6/13/19 - not addressed

Please refer to the applicant letter dated May 15, 2019 (hereinafter referred to the applicant letter). Comment #3 states that a comment is shown on the Final Development Plan about its removal, with no other information. The response letter states that this note has been removed. However, it is still a requirement that the water main in this location, from Main St. to Market St., be properly abandoned. Notes should be provided on the Final Development Plan which reference the public improvement plans for additional information regarding this abandonment.

Please refer to comment #4 of the previous applicant letter. Sheet C.100 now includes additional notes, but refers to a non-existent detail on Sheet C.010.

Sheet C.010: The manhole beneath the new building is shown to be abandoned in place. Wasn't this manhole to be completely removed?

Sheet C.010: The detail for the manhole abandonment references a building footing. Isn't this no longer applicable to the remaining manholes to be abandoned in place? Aren't the remaining manholes well away from any building footings? If not, shouldn't they also be completely removed?

Please refer to comment #5 of the previous applicant letter. Sufficient notes which reference the public plans should be provided concerning the abandonment or removal of the water line on the north side of the development.

Sheet C.202: Although it is acceptable to leave GEN-3A within the plans, we are still missing Section A-A, B-B, and C-C as required by Section 5304.8 of the Design and Construction Manual. Section A-A must be shown for the long axis of the ramp, Section B-B across the width of the ramp, and Section C-C along the curb opening of the ramp.

Sheet C.400: A note is shown which points to the existing water line to be removed/abandoned on the north side of the development. This notes says "New Private Storm Line 1". Is this a typographical error?

Sheet C.400: The note "Abandon Sanitary Manhole in Place" is still shown for the manhole which was already removed?

Sheet C.300: Please follow generally-accepted drafting standards, and call-out the detail and sheet number to be used for the installation of the curb inlet in the southeast corner of the project. We are assuming this is STM-1 shown on Sheet C.601.

Sheet C.300: A site visit showed what appears to be a direct conflict with an existing decorative light pole for storm line 1. It appears this is barely shown on Sheet C.300, although it is not clear. As per Public Works, this decorative light pole cannot be moved, and relocation of the storm line should be directed around this light pole.

Notes are missing from Sheet C.400 related to the requirement that the cut-in tee on Main St. be coordinated with all affected property owners, with a minimum 48 hour notice, and night work in order to make the complete connection. The maximum water shut-down period is 8 hours.

Please see comments related to the public improvements (i.e., stormwater, sanitary abandonment, water line abandonment, water line relocation, streetscape removal and relocation, pavement repair, etc.). These comments will likely have a direct impact on the Final Development Plan.

An itemized and sealed Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Costs should accompany your final submittal drawings, or prior to determination of the fees for the project.

Architectural sheets provided with the most recent submittal only depicted the proposed Reece Nichols building on Main St. Please provide the architectural sheets for the proposed Market St building.

Sheet C.011: This sheet describes items to be completed along with the public improvements (i.e., water main relocation and public storm line). Please remove from the Final Development Plan.

Sheet C.010: Proper abandonment of sanitary sewer mains includes plugging each end with a minimum of 1 foot of non-shrink grout sealed with a portland cement grout. The notes specify "plugging" the line, with no other specific information regarding the method for plugging and abandoning the lines in-place.

Sheet C.100: The existing water main on the north side of the property line is shown being removed, with no other information. All aspects of this removal should be shown in the public improvement plans (i.e., water main relocation and storm sewer plans).

Sheet C.100: There is conflicting notes on this sheet concerning the disposition of the existing sanitary sewer main running north/south. The note on this sheet states that removal of the line will take place. Other sheets state this line will be abandoned in-place. Please reconcile by stating which method will be used to properly remove or abandon in-place.

General Note Concerning Removal/Abandonment of Water Mains and/or Sanitary Sewer Mains: These items should be shown on the public improvement plans (i.e., water main relocation and storm sewer plans), along with a reference to these items within the Final Development Plan (i.e., by note stating "see public improvement plans" or equivalent language).

Sheet C.200: It appears an additional curb inlet is warranted to collect stormwater from the parking lot. Otherwise, where will stormwater on the north side of the "divide" flow? It would appear from this sheet that stormwater would flow toward the existing building?

Sheet C.202: The ADA-accessible ramp detail still does not comply with Section 5304.8 of the Design and Construction Manual. You have referenced a standard detail which does not show the slopes, elevations, cross-slopes and other information required by Section 5304.8. Again, GEN-3A is a generic detail, and is not intended for site-specific design detail.

Sheet C.400: This sheet shows several inconsistencies between what is shown elsewhere in the plan set. This sheet calls-out the sanitary sewer line as being abandoned in-place, but elsewhere in the plan set, the sanitary sewer is shown to be removed. There is also no mention of the water line to the north being removed. There is also no mention of the existing manhole within the boundary of the new building being abandoned. There are no references to properly removing concrete panels and replacing panels along Market St.

Sheet C.600: A revision note is provided stating that GEN-3A was removed. However, it still remains in the plan set (see previous comment).

Code Statement

All issues pertaining to life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures and premises, and to the safety to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations, shall be in accordance with the 2018 International Fire Code.

Fire Lanes - Marking

IFC 503.3 - Where required by the fire code official, approved signs or other approved notices or markings that include the words NO PARKING—FIRE LANE shall be provided for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads or prohibit the obstruction thereof. The means by which fire lanes are designated shall be maintained in a clean and legible condition at all times and be replaced or repaired when necessary to provide adequate visibility. Action required: Both sides of the alley shall be posted "No Parking-Fire Lane".

There does not seem to be an accessible route to access the proposed ADA ramp on the backside of the Market St building. Please label the width of the ADA ramp. Your response letter dated May 3, 2019 states sheet C.201 gives these details. This sheet only gives details for the ADA ramp on the backside of the Main St building but no details are given for the Market St building.

Parking stalls are required to be 19’x9’ unless they are adjacent to a 5’ sidewalk or green space. The parking stalls adjacent to the proposed ADA ramp on the back side of the Market St building do not seem to meet this requirement. The proposed ramp will not allow for VEHs to overhang the curb.

Please identify if the mechanical equipment is to be rooftop mounted or ground mounted. Please show the Location, size and materials to be used in all screening. A dashed line indicating the roofline and rooftop mechanical equipment is also required. Please also provide the manufacturer’s specification sheets for proposed mechanical equipment to be used.

Thank you for labeling the proposed building materials. EIFS is not an approved material in the CBD district. Please replace this with an acceptable building material. This comment was made during the PDP and stucco was substituted.

Show where the flat curb transitions to CG-1 on the south side of the alley (suggest a 5' transition length, potentially starting at the PT of the alley side of the curb return).

The label for ROW on the east-west alley is pointing to the wrong line and the revised ROW line location on the south side of the same alley should also be called out. (It also should not be shown crossing the north-south alley).

The proposed utility pole just east of the existing utility pole in the alley intersection (noted for guy wires), should be moved about 4-5 feet towards the east to avoid conflict with turning traffic.

Modify the curb inlet in the alley (south of/adjacent to the trash enclosure) to an area grate inlet and eliminate the curbing so that the area is flat/traversable by trucks that turn the corner and overlap the area a few feet. Also remove the same curb south of the trash enclosure to allow for the SU truck movement.

ROW/Easements: - A portion of the curb returns at the east-west alley intersection with Market Street, north and south sides, are outside of proposed ROW. Additional corners of ROW will be needed to include the curb return. - A small easement just south of the trash enclosure will also be needed to ensure the overlapping area of truck movements is publicly accessible without encroachments (an area approximately 25' long extending between the trash enclosure and south property line X 10' wide extending east of the alley ROW line). - Will the sidewalk along the north side of the project be within a public sidewalk easement?

The sidewalk location on the north side of the development (and portions of other sidewalk) are not dimensioned in the plans (e.g. changes in alignment, PI's, offsets, tie's to existing, etc.).

Code Statement

All issues pertaining to life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures and premises, and to the safety to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations, shall be in accordance with the 2012/18 International Fire Code.

It was our understanding that all stormwater improvements were to be private rather than public. As shown, a portion of the stormwater conveyance system is shown as public. All of the stormwater improvements for this site should be private, including the portion beneath Main St. RCP is still required, however, beneath Main St., regardless of whether it is public or private.

A curb inlet is shown in the middle of Main St. This obviously is not a suitable design.

There is concern that the 15 inch HDPE pipe between the new building, and the existing building to the south, may affect the integrity of the existing building to the south during construction. With proper bedding around the 15 inch HDPE pipe, including the sides, there appears to be only a few inches between the building and the storm line. It is unknown whether this installation will affect the footing of the existing building to the south.

Private storm line 1 shown on the plans appears to be deep, for no apparent reason. Please see comment above describing our concerns about the new private storm line affecting the integrity of the existing building to the south. Isn't it possible to provide a more shallow installation of this line? Is it possible to provide a smaller pipe diameter, and still provide enough capacity? It would seem that these two changes would be a better approach.

Sheet C.100: The paver "Sidewalk/Brick Paver Detail" shown on this sheet is incomplete. The maximum design cross-slope of the sidewalk is 1.5%. WWF is not desired. KCMMB concrete must be specified. Slope call-out was not shown on the brick paver section. Note 3 must include a statement that the paver material and color will match the existing material and color. Finally, expansion joints and contraction joints must be made in the PCC base, as well as weep holes with permeable geofabric drilled/placed on each PCC underlayment panel, on each panel, on the low side.

Sheet C.201: A concrete flume is shown between the new building, and the existing building to the south. No reference is provided to a design detail showing how this will be constructed. Standard drafting practice should be followed, including the detail number, and sheet number.

Sheet C.202: Cross-sections were not provided (i.e., Section A-A, Section B-B, and Section C-C) as required by Section 5304.8 of the Design and Construction Manual. Please review the "Minimum Required Information for Trail, Sidewalk, and Curb Ramp Detail Sheets" which was provided separately via email for other requirements.

Sheet C.202: The maximum distance between the detectable warning surface and the back of curb is 5.0 feet. As shown on the detail, this distance is exceeded on the southern ADA-accessible ramp.

Sheet C.301: Remove all references to "PUBLIC" on the profile view and plan view. As previously discussed, all storm lines on this project, including the lines and structures installed within the right of way, should be designated as private.

Sheet C.501: Please show the hydraulic grade line for the design storm within the storm line. This should be shown on the profile view. A tablature calculation sheet should also be provided showing the assumptions made to make this determination, including the assumptions made for the receiving storm sewer (i.e., at the junction box in the middle of Main St.).

Sheet C.301: If the flume between the new building, and the existing building to the south is intended to act as a emergency overflow swale, in addition to directing stormwater not collected by this development, then please label this as "emergency overflow swale", along with calculations showing the 100 year water surface elevation within the emergency overflow swale.

Sheet C.302: The roof drain plan is missing the corresponding profile view of storm lines greater than 6 inches in diameter.

Sheet C.302: There is no specific call-out for the materials, slope, length, etc. used in the assumed 6 inch storm line serving the downspouts for the new building adjacent to Market St.

Sheet C.302: Where are the existing buildings discharging their dowspouts? It was our understanding they would also be tied into the new system. If not, then their discharge (if applicable) would need to be counted in the calculations of stormwater discharge within the concrete flume?

Sheet C.302: The drawing shows that the new building along Market St. will have all of the downspouts directed to the new private storm system. This also appears to be the case for the new building along Main St. Please be aware that no building downspout will be allowed to direct-discharge across the sidewalk on either Market St. or Main St. based on these plans.

Sheet C.400: It was our understanding that the existing sanitary sewer line north of City manhole #30-294 was going to be partially abandoned. What is proposed for this line? Are you proposing to leave the sanitary sewer line "as-is"? During our meeting on-site, it was our understanding that there was still some investigation left to be done concerning this sanitary sewer line, and its final disposition.

Sheet C.400: A gate valve serving the new fire line for the new building on Market St. is shown within the confines of the brick paver stone area. Why was this location chosen to provide a cut-in tee? Wouldn't it be better to move the cut-in tee to the southeast, so the gate valve can be located within the limits of the KCMMB entrance?

Sheet C.400: The fire line serving the new building along Main St. is shown well above the 50 feet limit set forth in the Design and Construction Manual.

Sheet C.600: GEN-3A is provided, and as we have previously discussed on past projects, is not applicable to these types of projects. A site-specific design is required. Please remove this standard detail.

Other Missing Items from the Standard Detail Sheets on Sheet C.601: The following items were missing: 1) gate valve and box, and 2) stormwater structures such as junction box (if applicable), stormwater manhole (if applicable). If other standard details are needed after any re-design, or after addressing the other comments in this letter, then please provide them.

The detail shown on Sheet C.601 for pavement repair is inadequate. Dowel and rebar placement must be shown for the panel removal and replacement, not merely called-out as a note on the standard detail. In other words, show where the dowels will be placed, and show where the rebar will be placed in plan view. As presented on this marked-up version of the standard detail, it would appear that rebar and dowels are to be placed all around the panel. They are not. Rebar should be shown along the longitudinal joint, and dowels along the transverse joints. A typical section view should be provided. Rebar and dowels must be epoxy-coated. It must also include the subgrade design, including MoDOT Type 5 aggregate (minimum 6 inch), and geogrid meeting the requirements of the Design and Construction Manual.

Sufficient notes must be placed on the water line relocation plans stating that: 1) water shut-down must not exceed 8 hours, and all work must be performed during night time hours, 2) contractor must coordinate with any affected water customers prior to shut-down of the water main, and sufficient notice given (i.e., 48 hours) prior to shut-down of the water line.

Water line relocation plans were missing the existing materials (i.e., size and type) of the water line, and size and type of the proposed water line. Thrust block design was also missing, and was not shown on the plans.

Traffic control plan was missing.

An Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Costs is required prior to final approval of any plans.

Please label the distance the parking lot turning area is set back from the north property line. This must be a minimum of 6’. Additionally, please continue the curbing to run parallel to the sidewalk.

Please provide details for the parking lot gates that have been mentioned in previous conversations.

There does not seem to be an accessible route to access the proposed ADA ramp on the backside of the Market St building. Please label the width of the ADA ramp.

Parking stall are required to be 19’x9’ unless they are adjacent to a 5’ sidewalk or green space. The parking stall adjacent to the proposed ADA ramp on the Market St building do not seem to meet this requirement. The proposed ramp will not allow for VEHs to overhang the curb.

Comments 2, 3, 4, 5, 12 and 13 from the Applicant’s Letter dated March 20, 2019 have not been addressed. See below for the additional information needed. • Please identify if the mechanical equipment is to be rooftop mounted or ground mounted. Please show the Location, size and materials to be used in all screening. A dashed line indicating the roofline and rooftop mechanical equipment is also required. Please also provide the manufacturer’s specification sheets for proposed mechanical equipment to be used. • Please provide the manufacture’s spec sheets for all proposed exterior lighting fixtures. • Staff is fine with the massing of the proposed building at 207 SW Market St but would like to see some of the architectural elements changes so the two buildings are not so similar. As an example, the cast stone band between the two levels could be removed and replace with a soldier course of brick and/or the top crown molding could be replaced with an accident of brick corbelling. • Please provide details for the 2nd story residential units at 207 SW Market St. • Please label the building materials and colors proposed to be used on the exteriors of the building on 207 SW Market St. • All parking lots containing 11 or more stalls must be illuminated. Please provide details and a photometric plan that complies with this UDO requirement.

Domestic water system design incomplete. Provide the following: - Specify all water pipe materials 4/15/19 - not addressed - Specify either 1" or 2" water tap as that is the only options available through our water utility. (either can be used with a 1-1/2" water meter) 4/15/19 - 1-1/2" tap is still shown.

Separate plans are required for the public sanitary sewer relocation. Design considerations should include the apparent proximity of the public water main to the proposed sanitary sewer line, which appears to be less than 10 feet.

Sheet C.050, C.051, C.052: A gutter buddy is shown in the right of way. All erosion and sediment control measures must be contained on-site. Please delete this feature.

Sheet C.100: "Brick Streetscape" is shown, with no corresponding reference to any specific design details included elsewhere in the plan set. The details must be referenced on this sheet, and provided elsewhere in the plan set. Items to include are: 1) brick pavers with sand underlayment and minimum 4" concrete underlayment beneath the sand layer, with drainage weepholes to facilitate drainage, 2) final placement of pavers to be finished with a sand layer broomed into the joints, 3) pavers to match the existing brick pavers in the downtown area, 4) streetscape trees and planter boxes, 5) streetscape lighting details.

Sheet C.100: "New ADA Ramp" is called-out in several locations, with no corresponding reference to a specific design detail contained elsewhere in the plan set. Please call-out the design detail, and provide a site-specific design for these features. Please provide the information required under Section 5304.8 of the Design and Construction Manual.

Sheet C.100: "Asphalt" is called-out, with no specific reference on this sheet to the typical section view of the pavement design. Please provide a reference to the pavement design, and include this design/typical section elsewhere within the plan set. Please be aware that the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) has specific design requiremetns for pavement.

Sheet C.100: CG-1 curb and gutter is called-out with no specific design reference. Please call-out the sheet and detail concerning this feature, and also include a detail showing the extension of the aggregate base and geogrid/subgrade stabilization being extended a minimum of one (1) foot beyond the back of curb to prevent rotation of the curb and gutter.

Sheet C.100: A note stating "relocate light pole" is shown, with no corresponding reference to how and where this is to take place. Please provide a specific reference to the sheet and detail number of this relocation, and include a details necessary to complete the work, including, but not limited to, brick paver repair/replacement.

Storm Sewer Upgrade Comments: The storm line should be designated as "private" for the entire length (i.e., from the new private curb inlet, to the public storm sewer manhole in the middle of Main St.). We do not feel there is a need to construct a new curb inlet at the location shown, but rather, a junction box or manhole.

Since the new storm line would be considered private as discussed above, the plans should be revised to include all necessary design details concerning the placement of the junction box/manhole, concrete panel removal and replacement (including dowels and rebar locations and sizing), subgrade compaction, traffic control, streetscape removal and replacement, lighting relocation, and all other design details necessary to complete the work.

It is possible that the water line may conflict with the installation of the storm sewer as described above. It appears the storm sewer manhole in the middle of Main St. is relatively shallow.

Sheet C.302: Where are the roof drains serving the building on Lot 1?

Concerning the note above, the City will not allow the free discharge of roof drainage across the sidewalk or brick pavers.

Sheet C.400: As previously discussed, the public sanitary sewer main relocation must be provided on a separate plan set. One item to consider during the design of this sewer, is the proximity to the existing water line. A minimum of 10 feet horizontal distance is required from the outside of the sanitary sewer, and the outside of the water line.

Sheet C.400: Is the "San. Stub" shown at the sanitary sewer main in the alley an existing or proposed stub? Please clarify. If proposed, then please specify a wye connection, and provide specific notation concerning the standard detail (which was not provided in the plans).

Sheet C.400: The domestic water line and fire line are shown, but there are no specific design details concerning panel removal and replacement to accommodate these connection points. The Ctiy will not allow a piecemeal approach to water connections, but rather, full panel removal and replacement. Since you are already removing panels to accommodate the new storm sewer, it may be beneficial to consider a new location for the domestic water line and fire line connection points, to coincide with the panel removal and replacement for the storm sewer.

Sheet C.400: In general, this sheet suffers from poor drafting quality, and is missing a defined back of curb, references to details concerning specific designs contained elsewhere in the report, and vague notes concerning what is proposed.

Sheet C.400: A gate valve is required on the fire line branch, immediately to the west of the new cut-in tee.

Sheet C.400: Please provide specific sheet and detail number references for the following: 1) new 1.5 inch domestic water line (must be copper), 2) water meter, 3) sanitary sewer wye, 3) cut-in tee for the fire line.

The following items were missing from the standard detail sheet: 1) brick paver detail, 2) street repair, full panel repair and replacement including subgrade, 3) trenching and backfill detail, 4) sanitary sewer connection, 5) water meter, 6) storm castings, 7) curb and gutter detail, including the subgrade design being extended a minimum of one (1) foot beyond the back of curb, 8) paving detail for parking lot in accordance with the UDO, 9) streetscape details from Public Works.

Other information missing from the plan set include a notation on the paving plan on where heavy duty or normal asphaltic concrete is being used.

New commercial entrances must be shown with KCMMB concrete from the right of way, to the sawcut. A clean joint is required.

Sheet C.100: The telephone pedestal is shown as being relocated, but the new location is not shown.

Sheet C.400: A new fire hydrant is proposed along Market St. on Sheet C.100, but Sheet C.400 shows no such fire hydrant. We are showing the existence of a fire hydrant near this location, but it is not clear whether this fire hydrant will need to be relocated? If so, then specific locations and notes must be provided showing where this will be placed.

An alley repair/pavement repair plan to accommodate the new sanitary sewer laterals must be provided.

The private storm sewer beneath Main St. should be specified as RCP due to the road classification (i.e., commercial local).

An Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Costs is required prior to approval of the Final Development Plan.

Please label the dimensions of the ADA aisle.

All parking lots containing 11 or more stalls must be illuminated. Please provide details and a photometric plan that complies with this UDO requirement.

Please provide the manufacture’s spec sheets for all proposed exterior lighting fixtures.

Please identify if the mechanical equipment is to be rooftop mounted or ground mounted. Please show the Location, size and materials to be used in all screening. A dashed line indicating the roofline and rooftop mechanical equipment is also required. Please also provide the manufacturer’s specification sheets for proposed mechanical equipment to be used.

Please label the building materials and colors proposed to be used on the exteriors of the building on 207 SW Market St.

On sheet C.001 in the site data table, please update the current/proposed zoning to reflect the correct zoning district, CBD.

Please provide a land use table that indicates the below information for each lot independently. • Total floor area • Number of dwelling units • Land area • Number of required and proposed parking spaces • Impervious coverage • Floor Area Ratio (FAR)

Parking lots shall be set back a minimum 6’ from the side or rear property line when not part of shared parking and/or cross access. This commit was brought to your attention in the Applicant’s Letter dated August 1, 2018. Since a modification was not requested or granted, the parking lot/turnaround area along the north property line must meet the UDO requirements.

Parking lots with 51- 75 stalls shall provide a minimum of 3 ADA complaint parking spaces. Of these three, 1 must be van accessible.

An easement for pedestrian access is needed for the sidewalk that runs adjacent to the north property line of Lot 1.

Staff would like to see the first floor of 207 SW Market St raised to a minimum of 14’.

Staff is fine with the massing of the proposed building at 207 SW Market St but would like to see some of the architectural elements changes so the two buildings are not so similar. As an example, the cast stone band between the two levels could be removed and replace with a soldier course of brick and/or the top crown molding could be replaced with an accident of brick corbelling.

Please provide details for the 2nd story residential units at 207 SW Market St.

Code Statement

All issues pertaining to life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures and premises, and to the safety to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations, shall be in accordance with the 2012/18 International Fire Code.

Fire Lanes - Marking

IFC 503.3 - Where required by the fire code official, approved signs or other approved notices or markings that include the words NO PARKING—FIRE LANE shall be provided for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads or prohibit the obstruction thereof. The means by which fire lanes are designated shall be maintained in a clean and legible condition at all times and be replaced or repaired when necessary to provide adequate visibility. Actionrequired: The alley shall be posted No Parking Both Sides Of Lane.

Knox Locks

IFC 506.1 - Where access to or within a structure or an area is restricted because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving or fire-fighting purposes, the fire code official is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an approved location. The key box shall be of an approved type listed in accordance with UL 1037, and shall contain keys to gain necessary access as required by the fire code official. 506.1.1 Locks. An approved lock shall be installed on gates or similar barriers when required by the fire code official. Action required: Knox boxes shall be posted above each FDC.

FDC

IFC 903.3.7 - Fire department connections. The location of fire department connections shall be approved by the fire code official. Connections shall be a 4 inch Storz type fitting and located within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, or as approved by the code official. Action required: Show the location of the FDC on 207 SW Market.

2012 IPC 708.3.2 Building sewers. Building sewers shall be provided with cleanouts located not more than 100 feet apart measured from the upstream entrance of the cleanout. For building sewers 8 inches and larger, manholes shall be provided and located not more than 200 feet from the junction of the building drain and building sewer, at each change in direction and at intervals of not more than 400 feet apart. Manholes and manhole covers shall be of an approved type. Action required: Modify utility plan to show required waste pipe cleanouts.

Domestic water system design incomplete. Provide the following: - Specify all water pipe materials - Specify either 1" or 2" water tap as that is the only options available through our water utility. (either can be used with a 1-1/2" water meter)

The plans need to show all improvements along Market and W. Main Street, including the areas of restoration where demo is proposed. These improvements include curb and gutter, street light relocation, streetscape (brick pavers), etc. that are not shown on the plans, have not been noted, dimensioned or detailed for construction.

The plans show gates on the parking lot. If a SU Truck cannot make the turning movement from the east-west alley to the north-south alley (which will be southbound one-way only) without completing a multi-point turn (e.g. backing into the parking lot), then the parking lot cannot be gated restricting the movement of delivery vehicles, trash haulers, etc. These types of vehicles require access to the public alleys at all times. An alternative design was provided to the engineer that would accommodate a SU Truck movement without the need for multi-point turning or use of the parking lot area as an option. Please submit turning movements on a separate plan sheet for review of the alley to alley intersection (where the north-south alley intersects the east-west alley).

The plans should identify the location of existing utilities and proposed utilities. For example, where is the existing utility pole in the southwest corner of the alley to alley intersection in relation to the improvements? Will there be any protections constructed/intalled if the utility pole is otherwise surrounded by pavement/exposed to traffic in the alley (e.g. raised curb, bollards, etc.)?

The plans generally lack detail (dimensions, references, etc.) for construction; particularly ADA ramps, curb locations, saw cuts for demo/removals, tie-in points between proposed improvements and existing improvements, curb type transitions (between CG-1 and Flat Curb along the south side of alley, where curb transitions to no curb in the alley, or between CG-1 and pavement/sidewalk in the parking lot).

There is an unknown line shown on the plans along the westerly portion of the north-south alley. It is not an edge of pavement or curb. The entire area along this alley between buildings is paved and Right-of-Way (20' wide). Remove the line or describe what improvements are proposed.