| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Planning Review
|
Approved with Conditions
|
11/19/2020
|
11/19/2020
|
|
|
Jennifer Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
11/23/2020
|
11/17/2020
|
|
|
Kent Monter
|
|
|
DE C&O #01 Eng Plans – FDP/PDP
Corrective Action Required
All required engineering plans and studies, including water lines, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, streets and erosion and sediment control shall be submitted along with the final development plan. All public infrastructure must be substantially complete, prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy.
|
|
|
DE C&O #03 Eng & Insp Fees
Corrective Action Required
All Engineering Plan Review and Inspection Fees shall be paid prior to approval of the associated engineering plans and prior to the issuance of any infrastructure permits or the start of construction (excluding land disturbance permit).
|
|
|
DE C&O #09 FDP Reviews
Corrective Action Required
Certain aspects of the development plan will be further reviewed during the Final Development Plan phase of the project. This includes detailed aspects of the design to help ensure that the plan meets the design criteria and specifications contained in the Design and Construction Manual.
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Corrections
|
11/06/2020
|
11/06/2020
|
|
|
Jennifer Thompson
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The Lot 1 street tree requirement isn't met within the table, please revise.
Lot 2 street shrub requirement isn't met within the table, please revise.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The elevations for Shake Shack has changed dramatically. Staff has concerns the roof line may be too flat. Additional articulation is needed. There is alot of metal proposed, paticurally the west elevation. I don't believe we received a material sample for the metal, please provide.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Approved with Conditions
|
11/06/2020
|
11/06/2020
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
DE C&O #01 Eng Plans – FDP/PDP
Corrective Action Required
All required engineering plans and studies, including water lines, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, streets and erosion and sediment control shall be submitted along with the final development plan. All public infrastructure must be substantially complete, prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy.
|
|
|
DE C&O #03 Eng & Insp Fees
Corrective Action Required
All Engineering Plan Review and Inspection Fees shall be paid prior to approval of the associated engineering plans and prior to the issuance of any infrastructure permits or the start of construction (excluding land disturbance permit).
|
|
|
DE C&O #09 FDP Reviews
Corrective Action Required
Certain aspects of the development plan will be further reviewed during the Final Development Plan phase of the project. This includes detailed aspects of the design to help ensure that the plan meets the design criteria and specifications contained in the Design and Construction Manual.
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved with Conditions
|
11/06/2020
|
11/04/2020
|
|
|
Jim Eden
|
|
|
Code Statement
Corrective Action Required
All issues pertaining to life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures and premises, and to the safety to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations, shall be in accordance with the 2018 International Fire Code.
|
|
|
FDC
Corrective Action Required
IFC 903.3.7 - Fire department connections. The location of fire department connections shall be approved by the fire code official. Connections shall be a 4 inch Storz type fitting and located within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, or as approved by the code official.
Action required: On Lot 2, bring the FDC to the front (NW) corner of the building and move the fire hydrant to the end of drive-up lane.
|
|
|
Misc.
Corrective Action Required
Do not obstruct access to fire hydrants and FDC's with landscaping vegetation.
Action required: Make adjustments to the landscaping plan.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Approved with Conditions
|
11/06/2020
|
11/02/2020
|
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Lowenstien will require roadway improvements to urban standards west of Blacktwig to the western most property line of the development in compliance with the City's Unimproved Road Policy (similar to required improvements to Blacktwig by earlier development phase). This condition will be reflected on the staff recommendations for approval on the staff prepared Traffic Impact Analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Corrections
|
10/09/2020
|
10/12/2020
|
|
|
Jennifer Thompson
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Has any consideration been given to flipping Lot 1 and Lot 2? Meaning have the drive-thru on Lot 1 and sit down restaurant on Lot 2. Staff has initial concerns about potential issues with the drive-thru stacking and on-site circulation if the drive-thru is wildly successful.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The required parking counts are inaccurate within the Site Data table (sheet C3.0). 78 spaces are required for Lot 1 and 45 spaces are required for Lot 2. However parking needs are met.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Standard detail sheets were not received (i.e. pavement, curbing, accessible signage, trash enclosure, etc.)
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide the manufacture's specifications for all exterior wall lighting.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The landscape calculations are switched between Lot 1 and 2 in terms of street lengths, sq. footages. Also it seems that the required numbers aren't met/reflected within the table, but seems to be met on the plan?
The parking lot screening calculations are missing as well.
Please revise so we can re-evaluate.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Indicate the location of any proposed roof top units. They will be required to be screened via parapet.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Metal is a conditional material and will require approval through the governing body.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Staff has concern on the amount of EIFS proposed for Shake Shack. Typically our rule of thumb is no more than 30% per elevation.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
10/09/2020
|
10/07/2020
|
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
A Traffic Study Update/Memo was submitted for the subject PDP Application and companion PDP Application, both associated with Streets of West Pryor. The study should be included with both PDP Applications. The following comments pertain to the traffic study and may or may not directly relate to the subject PDP. However, some of these comments address clarity for which each application may be independently evaluated.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Traffic Study-Does the additional traffic generated and (re)distributed traffic (due to internal access and building layout changes) on Blacktwig at Chipman warrant a traffic signal? Address in update memo.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Traffic Study-Does the additional traffic generated and (re)distributed traffic (due to internal access and building layout changes) on Blacktwig at Lowenstein warrant an all-way stop condition? Address in update memo.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Traffic Study-An illustration depicting the location of new trips (in comparison to the previously approved plan) would be helpful in addressing resident concerns about impacts to Lowenstien, Blacktwig and intersection at Chipman.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Traffic Study-An assessment of impacted trip distribution needs to be included. It appears there’s significant change in traffic circulation (e.g. connection to the private roadways from the commercial development to Blacktwig via the west direct connection and apartment orientation). An exhibit that compares 2018 Generated Trip Distribution (Volume, Not Percentage) to Proposed Generated Trip Distribution (Volume, Not Percentage).
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Traffic Study-The proposed sport courts/outdoor athletic club needs to be accounted for in the trip generation.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
10/09/2020
|
10/06/2020
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Corrections
|
10/09/2020
|
09/29/2020
|
|
|
Jim Eden
|
|
|
Code Statement
All issues pertaining to life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures and premises, and to the safety to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations, shall be in accordance with the 2018 International Fire Code.
|
|
|
FDC
Corrective Action Required
IFC 903.3.7 - Fire department connections. The location of fire department connections shall be approved by the fire code official. Connections shall be a 4 inch Storz type fitting and located within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, or as approved by the code official.
The FDC's for each building are not shown. The distance from the private hydrant exceeds 100-feet from the building and any building mounted FDC.
|
|
|
Misc.
Corrective Action Required
Will each lot be under separate ownership? Generally, private fire protection (hydrants) are not shared between lots.
|
|
|
|
