Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
03/28/2022
|
03/28/2022
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
03/28/2022
|
03/23/2022
|
|
Brad Cooley, P.E., RSPI
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
12/08/2021
|
12/09/2021
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please combine into one complete set of plans. Incorporate all of the cover sheet information, notes, etc. expected in a plan set.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
What is the dashed line approximately 24’ beyond the ROW?
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Show the 15’ U/E on all sheets.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The erosion and sediment callouts and details are outdated. Please revise the plans to the current standards.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please include dimensions on the ADA ramps. These ramps do not require detectable warnings.
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
11/30/2021
|
11/29/2021
|
|
Brad Cooley, P.E., RSPI
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
11/04/2021
|
11/04/2021
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sidewalk is shown with 4 foot width. The City of Lee's Summit requires a 5 foot sidewalk. Please revise.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Pavement section is not in accordance with Design and Construction Manual. Please refer to the Design and Construction Manual for specific requirements for a local access street, and please ensure the typical section view shows the appropriate subgrade design, including either subgrade stabilization or geogrid, along with the respective MoDOT Type 5 aggregate thickness.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Plans were lacking an erosion and sediment control plan.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
A detailed grading plan was not provided. Please provide a grading plan.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
ADA ramps were not shown with specific details for their construction. Generic ramp details were provided which are not acceptable. Please provide a detail for each ADA-accessible ramp with appropriate elevation callouts, and slope callouts. Please ensure the City requirements of no more than 7.5% running slope and 1.5% cross slope are followed, which are above and beyond the requirements of PROWAG.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Fire hydrant too close to sidewalk. It appears it will need to be relocated as part of this project. Please show the location where it will be relocated, along with sufficient notes for the contractor/inspector.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
There were numerous strikeovers in plans that are illegible. Please ensure the plans are reviewed in terms of strikeovers.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Typical pavement section shall show the subgrade design a minimum of 1 foot beyond the back of curb.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Water line plans are missing, including the relocation of the fire hydrant at the cul-de-sac, and the short extension of the water main to a point just beyond the plat boundary (i.e., near the beginning of the PC of the cul-de-sac bulb). It would appear a short extension of water line is necessary, with relocation of the fire hydrant to a point between the sidewalk and the cul-de-sac, along with all callouts for bends, thrust blocks, and/or straddle blocks and valves.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sanitary manhole is in conflict near cul-de-sac. What is the plan for ensuring the manhole frame and lid conforms to ADA requirements within the sidewalk? Can it be adjusted to meet requirements?
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Existing cul-de-sac at end of English Manor Dr. shall be removed as part of this project. This was a temporary turnaround to be removed when a permanent cul-de-sac was installed. Please provide plans for this removal and replacement.
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
11/04/2021
|
11/03/2021
|
|
Brad Cooley, P.E., RSPI
|
|
|