| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Planning Review
|
No Comments
|
09/16/2021
|
09/20/2021
|
|
|
Jennifer Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
GIS Review
|
No Comments
|
09/16/2021
|
09/17/2021
|
|
|
Kathy Kraemer
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Approved with Conditions
|
09/16/2021
|
09/14/2021
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
DE C&O #01 Eng Plans – FP/PP
Corrective Action Required
All required engineering plans and studies, including water lines, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, streets and erosion and sediment control shall be submitted along with the final plat and approved prior to the approval of the final plat. All public infrastructure must be substantially complete, prior to the issuance of any building permits.
|
|
|
DE C&O #03 Eng & Insp Fees
Corrective Action Required
All Engineering Plan Review and Inspection Fees shall be paid prior to approval of the associated engineering plans and prior to the issuance of any site development permits or the start of construction (excluding land disturbance permit).
|
|
|
DE C&O #09 FDP Reviews
Corrective Action Required
Certain aspects of the development plan will be further reviewed during the Final Development Plan phase of the project. This includes detailed aspects of the design to help ensure that the plan meets the design criteria and specifications contained in the Design and Construction Manual.
|
|
|
|
|
GIS Review
|
No Comments
|
03/15/2021
|
03/15/2021
|
|
|
Kathy Kraemer
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Approved with Conditions
|
03/15/2021
|
03/15/2021
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
DE C&O #01 Eng Plans – FP/PP
Corrective Action Required
All required engineering plans and studies, including water lines, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, streets and erosion and sediment control shall be submitted along with the final plat and approved prior to the approval of the final plat. All public infrastructure must be substantially complete, prior to the issuance of any building permits.
|
|
|
DE C&O #03 Eng & Insp Fees
Corrective Action Required
All Engineering Plan Review and Inspection Fees shall be paid prior to approval of the associated engineering plans and prior to the issuance of any site development permits or the start of construction (excluding land disturbance permit).
|
|
|
DE C&O #09 FDP Reviews
Corrective Action Required
Certain aspects of the development plan will be further reviewed during the Final Development Plan phase of the project. This includes detailed aspects of the design to help ensure that the plan meets the design criteria and specifications contained in the Design and Construction Manual.
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Corrections
|
03/15/2021
|
03/15/2021
|
|
|
Jennifer Thompson
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The plat title on Sheet 2 is incorrect (in the title area and the certification area.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
03/15/2021
|
03/10/2021
|
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Revise Sheet 2, Tract A-G Note, for Tract G, such that the ownership and maintenance of Tract G is not specifically assigned to the City of Lee's Summit, but rather owned and maintained consistent with applicable rights-of-ways contiguous to the View High Drive right-of-way.
Otherwise the plat may be inconsistent with adjacent ROW ownership and agreements for maintenance.
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
No Comments
|
03/15/2021
|
03/08/2021
|
|
|
Mike Weisenborn
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
02/25/2021
|
02/25/2021
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please show and label all stream buffer boundaries within the plat boundary.
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Corrections
|
02/25/2021
|
02/25/2021
|
|
|
Jennifer Thompson
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The City signature lines are required to be on both sheets. Please align them in the same general location on sheet for ease of completing the signatures
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Revise the Planning Commission Secretary to John Lovell.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Does the gas/oil well note describe the entire boundaries within this plat? Please revise to simplify the description.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
A D/E is noted within the plat, however a definition is not provided, please include a definition.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Label the width of the sidewalks (5').
Provide a label for the sidewalks along the north side of Tract A.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
How many tracts are proposed for this plat? The plat title indicates A and B, but there are labels for A-G.
Tracts A-D are defined on Sheet 2. Please define the others.
Provide a note referencing and designating the entity responsible for maintenance and ownership of all Tracts.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The final plat shall not be recorded by the developer until the Director of Development Services and the City Attorney have reviewed and approved the Easements, Covenants, and Restrictions Agreement referenced on the plat. In addition, the approved Easements, Covenants and Restrictions Agreement shall be recorded at the time of the recording of the final plat.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide the coordinate table.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
What are the lines that seem like contours? Can these be removed?
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Can the line weight for the surrounding property owners be even lighter? It makes the plat very busy.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please provide a review sheet without all the bearings and distances.
|
|
|
|
|
GIS Review
|
Corrections
|
02/17/2021
|
02/17/2021
|
|
|
Kathy Kraemer
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
There are 2 distances coming from the point of beginning on Lot 1: 10046.92 and 1049.86. Which is correct?
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
On the east side of the southern cul-de-sac, does the curve go left or right on the dimension 2.46?
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
On the northern end of tract B (where it meets tract A) there seems to be some missing curve data after the dimension 13.59 bearing N14-7-45W.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
On the curve with the radius of 198, there are 2 lengths: 103.03 and 259.56. Which is correct?
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
No Comments
|
02/17/2021
|
02/17/2021
|
|
|
Jim Eden
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
02/17/2021
|
02/16/2021
|
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Tract G is not described; similar to Tract A, B, and C; except that Tract G is assumed future dedication as ROW to View High Drive as a portion of the roundabout matching ROW lines/Tract lines depicted on the infrastructure engineering plans.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
05/12/2020
|
05/12/2020
|
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The plat description of Tract A for all roads and omission of any ROW for View High Parkway and portions of roundabout along View High Drive is confusing. River and Paragon Pkwy are private streets. Is View High Pkwy not a future public street, or at least a portion thereof being on the KCMO street plan? If so, it (or portions thereof) should be ROW though maintained in the interim by the TDD under terms of agreement?
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The portion of Tract A near the intersection of View High Drive and Paragon Parkway may need revisions to encompass the entire right-of-way needed for the roundabout. The existing ROWs for View High Dr., proposed roundabout design and proposed Tract A don't make a clean delineation of responsiblity for the public road, private street and roundabout. Typically, ROW at a roundabout would include the approaching splitter islands.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
05/12/2020
|
05/12/2020
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please provide an exhibit that only shows the plat boundary, lot/tract lines, existing easements, and proposed easements to aid in the plat review. It is very difficult to verify existing and proposed easements, and this exhibit will help determine if any of the existing easements will need to be vacated. Revisions to the plat may be required, pending review of this exhibit.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
If the same type of easement, such as sanitary, is granted to multiple entities, please differentiate in labeling for clarity.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Are easements labeled "By Plat" existing easements that were dedicated on a previous plat and "By This Plat" proposed easements being dedicated now?
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Show and label all stream buffers and include the following language on the plat:
“In the areas designated as “Stream Buffer Easement” there is hereby granted to the City an easement for the purpose of prohibiting any development of any kind and prohibiting the erection, construction, placement or maintenance of any structures upon such land, as the term “structure” shall be defined in the City’s Unified Development Ordinance in Chapter 27 of the City Code of Ordinances, and prohibiting any change in the grade and elevation of such land, and prohibiting the alteration of the natural course and flow of the water in the stream, and prohibiting the damming or stoppage of the water in the stream, and to require the owners of such land to keep and maintain such land in its natural vegetative state and to tend, maintain and mow such land as required by the City’s Property Maintenance Code in Chapter 16 of the City Code of Ordinances, which easement shall constitute a servitude upon the land so encumbered and which shall run with the land in perpetuity and be binding upon the land owners, their successors and assigns and all other parties claiming under them, and shall remain in full force and effect forever.”
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Corrections
|
05/12/2020
|
05/11/2020
|
|
|
Jennifer Thompson
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Revise the department title for Ryan A. Elam to read: Development Services.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Revise the Planning Commission Secretary name to Carla Dial.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Label the proposed sidewalks along Tract A. The sidewalks shall be on both sides of the roadway/tract. Additional clarification is needed on the limits and extent of the sidewalk needed.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide a general building setback line dedication. Are setback lines proposed for the lots and tracts?
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The standard easement language needs to be added to the easement dedication paragraph. This can be found at: https://library.municode.com/mo/lee's_summit/codes/unified_development_ordinance?nodeId=ART7SU
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide easements that are required in conjunction with the development plan that is in review.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The final plat shall not be recorded by the developer until the Director of Development Services and the City Attorney have reviewed and approved the Easements, Covenants, and Restrictions Agreement referenced on the plat. In addition, the approved Easements, Covenants and Restrictions Agreement shall be recorded at the time of the recording of the final plat.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide an exhibit that shows the footprints of the proposed buildings in relationship to the lots/tracts/easements, etc.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide a correspondence/response letter based on staff's comments.
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
No Comments
|
05/12/2020
|
04/30/2020
|
|
|
Jim Eden
|
|
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Corrections
|
02/28/2019
|
03/01/2019
|
|
|
Jennifer Thompson
|
|
|
Legal Description
Corrective Action Required
Please submit an electronic copy of the legal description. Microsoft Word document or selectable text PDF are the preferred file formats. The legal description can be emailed to the planner's email address above.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide the lot numbers and tracts within the plat title.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Revise the Mayor's last name to Baird.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Revise the department title for Ryan A. Elam to read: Development Services.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Plat dedication paragraph is missing the undersigned name reference.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
When resubmitting please provide the final plat in electronic format.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Can the line weight defining the lot lines be darker?
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Update the vicinity map for the accurate location.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Update the year in the City of Lee's Summit signature block.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The description paragraph seems incorrect? Please clarify.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Label the proposed sidewalks along Tract A. The sidewalks shall be on both sides of the roadway/tract.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide a general building setback line dedication.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The final plat shall not be recorded by the developer until the Director of Development Services and the City Attorney have reviewed and approved the Easements, Covenants, and Restrictions Agreement referenced on the plat. In addition, the approved Easements, Covenants and Restrictions Agreement shall be recorded at the time of the recording of the final plat.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide the tract width dimensions.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
An additional dedication statement is needed dedicating any public infrastructure.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide easements that are required in conjunction with the development plan that is in review.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
02/28/2019
|
03/01/2019
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Show and label all public easements.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The north line is incorrectly labeled as the east line. Please revise.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
02/28/2019
|
02/26/2019
|
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Tract A should be subdivided into Tract A and Tract B, with one or the other assigned to the portion of View High Parkway that will have a right-of-way assigned to LSMO (and KCMO beyond the plat boundary). The portion of River Road (a private street) without right-of-way will remain in a tract. The separation of tracts at their intersection of View High Parkway and River Road should occur at or near the south end of the roundabout approach splitter island.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The portion of Tract A near the intersection of View High Drive and Paragon Parkway may need revisions to encompass the entire right-of-way needed for the roundabout.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The rights-of-ways for View High Drive (including roundabout at Paragon Parkway) and View High Parkway (including the roundabout at River Road) should be shown on the plat as easements to LSMO or KCMO, as applicable. The right-of-way width determined to be required by KCMO for View High Parkway should have a consistent width the length of View High Parkway though the roadway improvements may narrow east of River Road. This right-of-way should include the entire roundabout at River Road and the approach splitter island along River Road. The right-of-way along View High Drive should include the entire roundabout and the approach splitter island along River Road.
|
|
|
Right-of-way, whether KCMO or LSMO shown along or adjacent to the plat in assoction with View High Drive and View High Parkway will be maintained by the TDD per separate agreement. River Road and Paragon Parkway do not require right-of-way as public streets of the TDD.
|
|
|
|
|
GIS Review
|
No Comments
|
02/28/2019
|
02/26/2019
|
|
|
Kathy Kraemer
|
|
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
No Comments
|
02/20/2019
|
02/20/2019
|
|
|
Jim Eden
|
|
|
|
