| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
As-graded MDP Review
|
No Comments
|
10/18/2022
|
10/18/2127
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Record Drawings Review
|
No Comments
|
12/15/2022
|
12/14/2022
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Record Drawings Review
|
Corrections
|
12/05/2022
|
12/05/2022
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
As-graded MDP Review
|
No Comments
|
11/16/2022
|
11/02/2022
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Record Drawings Review
|
Corrections
|
10/18/2022
|
10/25/2022
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
As-graded MDP Review
|
Corrections
|
10/14/2022
|
10/11/2022
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
05/17/2021
|
05/17/2021
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
05/06/2021
|
05/06/2021
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
05/06/2021
|
05/03/2021
|
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
04/08/2021
|
04/08/2021
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please see previous comment letter concerning street naming. Planning apparently attempted contacting Brock Worthley concerning an acceptable street name, and removing any reference to "Circle". The name shall be Hook Farm Dr.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please provide justification for the offset ADA-accessible ramp shown on Sheet C124. Unless specific justification is provided, the City does not feel this offset ADA-accessible route across the street is warranted.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
04/08/2021
|
04/07/2021
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Wings are shown on the ADA-accessible ramps. Please remove the wings, and either show grading to the sidewalk, or a straight curb which tapers to zero towards the top of the ramp. Nick Heiser is familiar what we need concerning this issue.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C128: A turning space with the minimum 4 by 4 foot dimension shall be provided at the top of the ramp on the east side of the street. A portion of the angled sidewalk may be designed as a turning space using the proposed geometry. Other geometries may be considered if grading will not allow.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Ensure the ADA-accessible ramp details show the extent of the construction. Suggest a lighter lineweight to denote ramp to be installed by homebuilder, along with a legend or notes denoting the lineweight representation.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The MBOE table was completely removed from the plans. Are there any lots that would require an MBOE(s) to be established, based on the engineer's recommendation?
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
It appears the storm system was not designed for gravity flow (i.e., at or below the crown of the pipe) for the 100 year event. Although not required to be designed to this standard, an overflow route would need to be established for any stormwater that surcharges out of the top of the inlet in such an event, and MBOEs established for affected lots. Please confirm no surcharging above the top of any structure occurs for the 100 year event. This may have a bearing on the MBOE issue discussed in the above comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
02/05/2021
|
02/05/2021
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
A stormwater report appeared to be missing for this phase of the project. In particular, the stormwater extended detention basin should be discussed, and calculations presented.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
We would suggest a re-evaluation of MBOEs based on conversations and emails provided previously on MBOE guidance. Although MBOEs can be specified for each lot, it is not necessarily required.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
We are assuming the extended detention basin after conversion from a sediment basin will not require any additional floodplain development permit? Will there be any additional grading within the floodplain which changes the ground elevations?
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Hook Farm Circle: An ADA-accessible ramp was not shown entering the cul-de-sac bulb, but rather, terminating within the right of way. The City has been terminating these ADA-accessible ramps into cul-de-sacs, and the plans should be revised. One option is to design a 90 degree ADA-accessible ramp entering the cul-de-sac bulb.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Plan and Profile Views for Storm Lines: Please provide a light hatching and appropriate notes which specify that all pipe being installed in fill locations be backfilled and compacted, followed by tenching and pipe installation in the fill area.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C138, C139, and C140 appear to be missing a flowline out for the storm lines entering the creek.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C131 appears to show the storm line daylighting into the extended detention basin at 940.0. The bottom of the basin appears to be flat for a portion of the basin bottom, and it would appear it will not properly.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The extended detention basin does not appear to be designed in accordance with the Design and Construction Manual in terms of freeboard between the nominal 100 year water surface elevation, and the spillway. It also does not appear to meet the clogged condition freeboard requirements from the flow within the emergency spillway and the top of the dam. A minimum 0.5 feet freeboard is required between the nominal 100 year water surface elevation and the spillway elevation, and a 1.0 foot freeboard requirement for the 100 year clogged condition flow within the spillway to the lowest point on the dam.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
There appears to be a discrepancy in the pipe size shown on the section view versus the profile view for the extended detention basin outlet pipe. The section view appears to show 9 inch diameter, and the profile view shows 12 inch.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Master Drainage Plan Comments: The City is ok with allowing side yard auxiliary swales to be installed by the homebuilder, as long as they are noted on the Master Drainage Plan (MDP). Other auxiliary swales such as those to be constructed on the rear property lines should be installed along with the public subdivision improvements.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Other Master Drainage Plan Considerations: The City is of the opinion that basement type should still be required for each lot, unlike the MBOE.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
02/05/2021
|
02/04/2021
|
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sidewalk Ramp missing across Hook Farm Cir. aligned with proposed ramp on Tracker Ln. on Layout Sheet. Sidewalk Ramp proposed near Lot 61/62 shall be moved to directly align with the proposed ramp on the southeast corner of the interesection. No unnecessary diagonal or angled roadway crossings.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sidewalk Ramp proposed near Lot 77/76 shall be moved to directly align with the proposed ramp on the southeast corner of the interesection. No unnecessary diagonal or angled roadway crossings.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sidewalk Ramp proposed near Lot 51/52 shall be moved to directly align with the proposed ramp on the southeast corner of the interesection. No unnecessary diagonal or angled roadway crossings.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Coordinate Street Name comment on Plat to Street Name Signs for Hook Farm Drive/Hook Farm Circle. Hook Farm Circle is not a Circle, but rather a Court. If acceptable by Planning, consider the portion of Hook Farm Drive continuing to the cul-de-sac without a name change.
|
|
|
|
