| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Record Drawings Review
|
No Comments
|
07/12/2022
|
07/12/2022
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Record Drawings Review
|
Corrections
|
05/31/2022
|
06/02/2022
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
As-graded MDP Review
|
No Comments
|
01/28/2022
|
01/28/2022
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
As-graded MDP Review
|
Corrections
|
01/21/2022
|
01/21/2022
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
10/12/2020
|
10/07/2020
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
10/12/2020
|
10/06/2020
|
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
04/02/2020
|
04/02/2020
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
04/02/2020
|
04/01/2020
|
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
01/22/2020
|
01/22/2020
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 6:
• The area north of proposed SW Kline Ave and east of proposed SW Summit View Trl is a long steep slope. Consider additional erosion control measures along the slope, not just at the downhill base of the slope.
• Is proposed Swale 1 being utilized for erosion and sediment control at all?
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 12:
• Revise General Note 5 to reflect that all lot elevations are proposed elevations.
• Revise the font for the Lot 92 elevations along SW Morris Dr. to match the elevations throughout the sheet and label as existing for clarity if appropriate.
• Proposed elevations are missing in the following locations:
o Rear corners of Lots 79/80, 80/81, 81/82, 113/114, 114/115, 115/116.
o SE corners of Lots 75, 105, 106, 117.
• Include MBOE for Tract D.
• Revise “(SS)” to “(SW)” in the Lot 97 MBOE label.
• Label proposed elevations as “Top of Berm” where appropriate.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 13:
• Lots 85-91 are adjacent to Swale 1 and require MBOEs to be set 2’ above the 100-year WSE. The topography makes meeting this requirement unrealistic. If the berm placed along the west side of the swale is 2’ above the 100-year WSE, the MBOEs for Lots 85-91 do not have to be based on the 100-year WSE within the swale. Verify the berm meets this requirement at ALL rear property corners of Lots 78-82 and 85-91.
• The use of ditch checks within Swale 1 are going to pond water on the upstream side of the ditch check. Since the swale is in a residential area, ponding isn’t desired. Please revise to eliminate the ponding.
• The drainage thru the swale will likely wash the mulch away. Please revise to eliminate the mulch.
• Provide landscape easements to contain the swales, with maintenance responsibility to the Homes Association.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheets 15-22: Include ADA-accessible route details, using the City of Lee’s Summit design standards, across intersections under stop control. In addition, the profile view of the roadway sections must be updated to clearly show the locations of these stop controlled intersections.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 25: Extend the existing grade line to the upstream end of Line 4-10 in the Profile view.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Does Estimate Item 10, Native Swale Seeding, include the plantings in the swale? Please clarify.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
01/22/2020
|
01/22/2020
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
12/06/2019
|
12/12/2019
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
General:
• Many of the proposed contours tie back into existing contours at very sharp angles. Please review the grading to smooth out the transition from proposed back into existing contours. Revise throughout the plan set.
• Please include a Summary of Quantities table.
• Submit an Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Costs.
• Submit the SWPPP and a copy of the MDNR Land Disturbance Permit.
• This project is unique in that it is so closely aligned with the Summit View Farms 5th Plat project in KCMO. Please provide confirmation from KCMO that they approve of detaining water from this project and for sharing the proposed sediment basin.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 1: The information in the Index of Sheets does not match the title blocks for sheets 20, 21, and 27. Please revise as needed.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 5:
• What is the heavy dashed line around or thru parts of the project?
• The project area is labeled as “Future Development.” Please revise.
• Please clarify whether or not construction of the sediment basin within the plat boundry will be performed with this project.
• Will SVF 4th and SVF 5th be constructed at the same time? Please provide a projected sequencing, emailed is fine, of how these 2 projects will work together.
• Is the offsite temporary diversion berm to be installed with this project?
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 6:
• The sheet name in the title block is incorrect, please revise.
• When will the sediment basin be removed? Please include specific requirements.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 8: Please replace the Sediment Trap standard detail with the Sediment Basin standard detail.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 12:
• Include a typical cross-section with design information for each swale.
• Clearly indicate a start and stop location for each swale typical section.
• Include calculations showing the native grasses planned for the swales are adequate for the proposed velocities.
• Why is there no east side slope specified for Swale 2?
• Is there a berm along the west side of Swale 1? If so, please include design requirements.
• Include 100-year WSE at every lot corner adjacent to a swale. MBOE must be 2 feet above 100-year WSE.
• Include a note regarding the limits of the swale IF that will help to clarify the required location of the typical section.
o Example Note: Swale sections extend the entire length between upstream and downstream structures with the exception of a transition at each structure.
• As-Graded Plot Plan requirements will now be designated on the MDP. Please designate, in tabular form, which lots have this requirement based on the following:
o Lots that include or are adjacent to engineered swales designed for stormwater conveyance.
o Lots adjacent to stormwater conveyances or features, such as drainage ways, detention basins, retention basins, etc.
o Lots that contain berms designed to direct stormwater runoff as a part of the overall stormwater design.
o Lots that require specific grading that is a part of the overall stormwater design.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheets 14-17: Show and label underdrain where required.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 14:
• Remove “SW National Ave” from the title block, it is not on this sheet.
• Relocate overlapping text near Sta. 18+50 in the Profile view for clarity.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 15: Please extend the existing grade line the entire length of the street.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheets 18-19: Sign designations are included in General Note 1, but not included in the Plan view. Please add.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 20: Some text appears to be cut off in the bottom of the top right section. Please revise.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 22:
• What does “(Piped)” refer to in the Tract D drainage area?
• It appears that Tract A drains to FI 4-11A, but the calculations include it in the drainage area for Line 4-13. Please clarify.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheets 24-26:
• Include the following note on any profile sheet applicable: “Compacted Fill shall be placed to a minimum 18” above the top of the pipe prior to installation.”
• Show and label the limits of the compacted fill placement in the Profile view. Use hatching for clarity.
• Storm sewer structures greater than 7’ deep require a special design. Please provide in the plan set.
• Please label vertical separations that are 2’ or less from outside of pipe to outside of pipe. If required separation isn’t provided, please revise so the requirement is met.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 24:
• Include removal of existing end section at CC 4-10J in Plan view and flowline in Profile view.
• Relocate the Line 4-10 1% HGL label leader so it clearly points to just the appropriate line.
• Please revise Lines 4-10 and 4-11 to contain the design HGL within the pipe system.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 25: Please label the horizontal separation between the sanitary MH and Line 4-13 near Sta. 3+50. If the required separation isn’t provided, please revise so the requirement is met.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 26:
• Include the sanitary crossing just upstream of JB 4-13B in the Line 4-15 Profile view.
• Please reverse the flowline information at JB 4-13B and CI 4-15B in the Profile views.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet 27: Provide detailed information in the plans regarding the native plantings required for the swales.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
12/06/2019
|
12/05/2019
|
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
End of Pavement OM's needed at the end of National not Serena
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The K value for Saddlebred does not meet minimum criteria near Sta. 13+00. Saddlebred and Enoch will both be streets extended south in the future as adjacent properties are subdivided.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Plans need to show the locations of stop signs and street name signs (e.g. post locations and noted signing on each post). The suffix TERR should be TER.
|
|
|
|
