Lee's Summit

MEMO. For ease of reference in the staff letter and approval ordinance (assuming City Council approves the subject application), and to provide clarity as to the intent of the "elevation revisions memo" provided, add a cover sheet to the memo that titles the document "Kensington Farms Design Guidebook".

GARAGE PROJECTION. Page 39 references that the largest garage protrusion (~10') across all of the models is found on the Fairfield model, but the elevations do not include this dimension as requested. Add a dimension label and leader to the respective side elevations to call out the protusion as previously requested.

RECESSED FRONT DOOR. As previously discussed, provide the dimension/distance that the recessed front doors are located relative to the front of the living space or garage as the case may be for the respective elevations.

ARCHITECTURE. - Provide one typical elevation of the remaining three (3) sides of each of the different "series" of homes being offered (i.e. Calistoga, Cardinale, etc.) in order to see fenestration patterns, material usage patterns, etc across all building sides for each series. - Provide clarification on the usage of materials on the sides and rears of the homes. Do your architectural standards require a mininum mix of materials or could they be a singular material. For example, could the sides and rear just be stucco, or do they require a mix of at least two of the materials from the proposed material palette? I understand that the Farmhouse option under each series appears to only use siding, but it uses a combination of lap siding with board and batten siding to provide contrast. - Will these proposed elevations replace all previously approved elevations, or do these elevations supplement the portfolio of previously approved elevations?

LOCATIONALITY. - The original Kensington Farms plan tied certain architectural styles and home types to certain sub-areas within the subdivision for some measure of uniformity. Please clarify if this plan proposes a similar approach or if the intent is to allow all proposed house types and styles to be located anywhere within the subdivision. For example, are the single-stories (i.e. reverse 1-1/2) allowed in the same areas as the two-stories? From a square footage standpoint, can the 2,140 sq. ft. Danbury be located next to a 3,300 sq. ft. Opus? Staff supports allowing a true mix of heights and styles throughout the subdivision, but if that is not the developer's intent, we need to define what is allowed where. - If the proposed elevations are locationally tied to certain sub-areas within the subdivision, provide a plan that graphically identifies the boundaries of such areas within the subdivision and calls out the architectural series allowed in the respective areas.

CURRENT CONDITIONS. Provide a plan that shows all the existing lots within the subdivision and then identify which lots are already developed; unsold lots; sold lots under construction; and sold lot not yet under construction in order to provide context for the current state of the subdivision.