| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Engineering Review - Water
|
Corrections
|
03/19/2026
|
03/19/2026
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
MDNR construction permit required prior to formal approval.
|
|
|
DE Engineers Estimate
Corrective Action Required
The Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Costs was not signed or sealed. In addition, the unit price for 12 inch water main appeared too low when compared to other projects with similar scope. In addition, unit prices for valves, tees, crosses, and bends were too low. Please submit a signed and sealed cost estimate with the changes noted, or provide sufficient documentation supporting the proposed unit cost for 12 inch water main installation, valves, tees, crosses, and bends.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Station 0+00: Record Drawings show the existence of a 22.5 degree vertical bend at this location. Water Utilities is asking that the connection point be moved to a point where a sloped connection is not existing.
COMMENT DID NOT APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
It is unclear whether sufficient cover will remain after connecting at station 0+00. Provide more notes about what will occur if there is insufficient cover after field-locating the line. A note such as "contractor to advise City if insufficient depth and possible re-design" would be appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Street and Storm
|
No Comments
|
03/12/2026
|
03/12/2026
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streets
|
No Comments
|
03/12/2026
|
03/11/2026
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streets
|
No Comments
|
02/20/2026
|
02/23/2026
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Street and Storm
|
No Comments
|
02/20/2026
|
02/20/2026
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Water
|
Corrections
|
02/20/2026
|
02/19/2026
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
MDNR construction permit required prior to formal approval.
|
|
|
DE Engineers Estimate
Corrective Action Required
The Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Costs was not signed or sealed. In addition, the unit price for 12 inch water main appeared too low when compared to other projects with similar scope. In addition, unit prices for valves, tees, crosses, and bends were too low. Please submit a signed and sealed cost estimate with the changes noted, or provide sufficient documentation supporting the proposed unit cost for 12 inch water main installation, valves, tees, crosses, and bends.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Station 0+00: Record Drawings show the existence of a 22.5 degree vertical bend at this location. Water Utilities is asking that the connection point be moved to a point where a sloped connection is not existing.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
It is unclear whether sufficient cover will remain after connecting at station 0+00. Provide more notes about what will occur if there is insufficient cover after field-locating the line. A note such as "contractor to advise City if insufficient depth and possible re-design" would be appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Water
|
Approved with Conditions
|
01/12/2026
|
01/07/2026
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
MDNR construction permit required prior to formal approval. MDNR concurrence letter, to be attached to the MDNR construction permit application, will be issued within ten (10) business days. .
|
|
|
DE Engineers Estimate
Corrective Action Required
The Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Costs was not signed or sealed. In addition, the unit price for 12 inch water main appeared too low when compared to other projects with similar scope. In addition, unit prices for valves, tees, crosses, and bends were too low. Please submit a signed and sealed cost estimate with the changes noted, or provide sufficient documentation supporting the proposed unit cost for 12 inch water main installation, valves, tees, crosses, and bends.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Water
|
Corrections
|
01/05/2026
|
01/05/2026
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Label the street name and M-291 on all applicable sheets.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Name of the plan set should be better defined. Suggest East Village Phase 1 Water Main Extension- Oldham Pkwy.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C501: 1) north arrow does not make sense. 2) title of sheet is "Utility Plan - North", which implies a "Utility Plan - South". Eliminate the "North" from the title.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C502: 1) A bold line is shown below the proposed 12 inch main and and labeled as a property line. Grey out to distinguish this feature from the proposed water main. 2) The stub at sta 8+00 is not approved for this project. The stub for the Oldham Village project was a special case, and the circumstances are not the same for this project.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sheet C503: 1) You are missing the bend callouts on Line 3. Please show all bend locatons and callouts. 2) The note requesting contractor to verify depth should be revised to state "depth of cover" so there is no confusion.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Length of the water main along Oldham is too long. Only that which is necessary to serve the last lot 4-story multi-family shown on the PDP should be shown.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Sealed and signed cost estimate required prior to formal approval. The included estimate was not sealed or signed.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
MDNR construction permit required prior to formal approval. MDNR concurrence letter will be issued following the submittal of approvable plans.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streets
|
Approved with Conditions
|
01/05/2026
|
12/31/2025
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
The Fiber, Signal and Lighting plans should be included with this submittal.
No Certificate of Occupation, temporary or permanent, will be allowed until signal plans are approved and the signal is operational.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Please include the Temporary Traffic Control Detail.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
The new signal should have a fiber connection to the signal at MO 291 signal.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
The turn lane improvements and any signal modifications along MO 291 are required with these improvements.
MoDOT approval of MO 291 improvements will need to be received and improvements constructed before final acceptance of these improvements.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
An offset/green space should be provided between the sidwalk and the back of curb.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
The median and curb should extend all the way to the intersection of MO 291.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
The right turn lanes on both EB and WB Oldham need to have 150 FT tapers. A contoured curbline is needed on the WB side out of the Costco main entrance.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
All medians should have radii, show the turning movements and consistently have round tapered noses.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
The second plan view on C-102 is incomplete and broken. Please correct and clearly label.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
The median at MO 291 materials should match the rest of the median along Oldham.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
If the median is to be stamped or stained concrete a spec needs to be provided.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
The larger medians to the east should be grass or sod medians.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Straighten the curbline at the east end of the improvements and widen the median in order to eliminate with curves.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
The street section should match what was used on Oldham Parkway in Oldham Village.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Lane widths should be measured from the front of gutterline not back of curb and they should match the widths at Mo 291.
Widths are still shown incorrectly in a few places.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
The medians shown should include curbs.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Finished slopes on the sides of the road should be a maximum 4:1.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Typical Sections for Sta. 5+59.97 -11+47.92 should have CG-1 curb in the medians.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Please show turning movements for a snow plow at the end of Oldham Parkway to ensure that they are able to make the turn-around at the end. If not a bulb may be needed.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
A Signing Plan is needed.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Please add the dashed left turn lines through the intersection at the Costco Entrance.
Lines were added for the NB to WB left turn but not the EB to NB left turn.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Please remove all straight arrows.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
All stop bars should be a minimum of 4 FT behind the crosswalk.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Arrows, crosswalks, dotted lines and stop bars should all be Preformed Thermoplastic.
Change Note 1 to state the above.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Striping plans as shown are not constructable as submitted. Please add stations or dimensions needed to locate in the field.
Dimensions are shown but are not designed per the LS Standard Detail for pavement marking. Please revise and include Standard Detail in plan set.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Please make sure that all notations on the profile view are visible. There are some areas where the text overlaps.
Some of the notations still overlap.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Please verify the Intersection Sight Distance is sufficient for the Right Turn Only looking east.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Check the Sight distance looking west for Right Turn on Red for both NB and WB movements.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Due to the incomplete nature of the plans, additional comments may be needed on future revisions.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Any plans not submitted with this set, i.e. signal and lighting plans, will require the usual 2 week review period.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Street and Storm
|
No Comments
|
01/05/2026
|
12/31/2025
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Please note: Since the traffic review includes extensive comments, additional comments will likely be required by the redesign.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
General:
• Submit an Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Costs.
• Review plan set for line weights, line labeling, missing street names, unreadable fonts, overlapping text, text cut off, etc. There are many instances so won’t list all out separately.
• Include current standard details.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.102: Clearly show the right-of-way dimensions.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C.103-C.104: Clearly show that the aggregate base and compaction of native subgrade extends a minimum of one (1) foot beyond the back of curb on all typical sections.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C.201-C.202: Label existing and proposed grade lines and ensure there are no gaps.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.203:
• Revise line weights and/or types so that drainage area delineation can be seen easier. As shown, all lines blend together.
• Relocate the drainage calculations to the following sheet. There is adequate room and that sheet has all of the structures labeled.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C.301-C.302:
• Include cardinal direction in Profile view structure label.
• A 0.5’ drop through the inlets connecting Lines 2 and 3 to Line 1. Revise in all Profile views.
• The crowns of the pipes entering Inlet 1-3 are lower than the crown of the pipe exiting the inlet. Please revise.
• Show and label the design HGL in all Profile views.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review - Streets
|
Corrections
|
12/19/2025
|
12/19/2025
|
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The Fiber, Signal and Lighting plans should be included with this submittal.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please include the Temporary Traffic Control Detail.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The new signal should have a fiber connection to the signal at MO 291 signal.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The turn lane improvements and any signal modifications along MO 291 are required with these improvements.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
An offset/green space should be provided between the sidwalk and the back of curb.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The median and curb should extend all the way to the intersection of MO 291.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The right turn lanes on both EB and WB Oldham need to have 150 FT tapers. A contoured curbline is needed on the WB side out of the Costco main entrance.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
All medians should have radii, show the turning movements and consistently have round tapered noses.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The second plan view on C-102 is incomplete and broken. Please correct and clearly label.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The median at MO 291 materials should match the rest of the median along Oldham.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
If the median is to be stamped or stained concrete a spec needs to be provided.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The larger medians to the east should be grass or sod medians.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Straighten the curbline at the east end of the improvements and widen the median in order to eliminate with curves.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The street section should match what was used on Oldham Parkway in Oldham Village.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Lane widths should be measured from the front of gutterline not back of curb and they should match the widths at Mo 291.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The medians shown should include curbs.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Finished slopes on the sides of the road should be a maximum 4:1.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Typical Sections for Sta. 5+59.97 -11+47.92 should have CG-1 curb in the medians.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please show turning movements for a snow plow at the end of Oldham Parkway to ensure that they are able to make the turn-around at the end. If not a bulb may be needed.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
A Signing Plan is needed.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please add the dashed left turn lines through the intersection at the Costco Entrance.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please remove all straight arrows.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
All stop bars should be a minimum of 4 FT behind the crosswalk.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Arrows, crosswalks, dotted lines and stop bars should all be Preformed Thermoplastic.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Striping plans as shown are not constructable as submitted. Please add stations or dimensions needed to locate in the field.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please make sure that all notations on the profile view are visible. There are some areas where the text overlaps.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please verify the Intersection Sight Distance is sufficient for the Right Turn Only looking east.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Check the Sight distance looking west for Right Turn on Red for both NB and WB movements.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Due to the incomplete nature of the plans, additional comments may be needed on future revisions.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Any plans not submitted with this set, i.e. signal and lighting plans, will require the usual 2 week review period.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Street and Storm
|
Corrections
|
12/19/2025
|
12/19/2025
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Please note: Since the traffic review includes extensive comments, additional comments will likely be required by the redesign.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
General:
• Submit an Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Costs.
• Review plan set for line weights, line labeling, missing street names, unreadable fonts, overlapping text, text cut off, etc. There are many instances so won’t list all out separately.
• Include current standard details.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.102: Clearly show the right-of-way dimensions.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C.103-C.104: Clearly show that the aggregate base and compaction of native subgrade extends a minimum of one (1) foot beyond the back of curb on all typical sections.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C.201-C.202: Label existing and proposed grade lines and ensure there are no gaps.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.203:
• Revise line weights and/or types so that drainage area delineation can be seen easier. As shown, all lines blend together.
• Relocate the drainage calculations to the following sheet. There is adequate room and that sheet has all of the structures labeled.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C.301-C.302:
• Include cardinal direction in Profile view structure label.
• A 0.5’ drop through the inlets connecting Lines 2 and 3 to Line 1. Revise in all Profile views.
• The crowns of the pipes entering Inlet 1-3 are lower than the crown of the pipe exiting the inlet. Please revise.
• Show and label the design HGL in all Profile views.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review - Water
|
Corrections
|
12/19/2025
|
12/19/2025
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Label the street name and M-291 on all applicable sheets.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Name of the plan set should be better defined. Suggest East Village Phase 1 Water Main Extension- Oldham Pkwy.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C501: 1) north arrow does not make sense. 2) title of sheet is "Utility Plan - North", which implies a "Utility Plan - South". Eliminate the "North" from the title.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C502: 1) Line 1 is too long. See subsequent comment below. 2) A bold line is shown below the proposed 12 inch main and is undefined. Is this a property line? If so, grey out and label as property line, 3) Fire hydrants at a maximum spacing of 300 feet are required. Ensure they meet the 20 foot setback from intersection point of curvature rule. 4) The tee at sta 3+64 should be a 12x12 inch tee with 12 inch gate valves on each leg, three (3) total. 5) The record drawing for the 12” main along 291 Highway shows the water main was installed deep. The connection point of Line 1 may be deeper than what is shown on sheet C.502. Line 3 may not be necessary. Suggest providing sufficient instructions on the plans in the form of notes to pothole this line prior to construction, and if necessary, remove the pipe and install new as shown, or alternatively, to leave in place subject to approval of City. 6) north arrow is not correct.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C503: 1) what does the straight bold line between Line 3 connection points along M-291 represent? We are showing an existing "jog" in the line at that location. 2) Line 3 is shown as a "jog" in the line, Isn't the "jog" in the line at the intersection of M-291 and Oldham Pkwy, an existing feature to be removed and abandoned? If so, provide notes stating the existing main will be removed. 3) linework to south of Line 1 needs to be defined. Is this a property line? If so use a different lineweight to differentiate between proposed improvements and existing features such as property lines. 4) what is the greyed-out feature shown parallel to line 3 on the north diagonal? If a retaining wall, 15 feet separation is required from any portion of retaining wall, including tie backs, geogrid, or other structural members of the retaining wall. 5) Line 2 sta 2+96 shows a fire hydrant in offset fashion, but the notes and leader show an inline fire hydrant. Reconcile 6) fire hydrants were missing along Oldham Pkwy. 300 foot maximum spacing for commercial areas is required. 7) sta 3+64 Line 1 needs three (3) valves at the tee, not two (2), and should be 12x12 tee, not an 8x8 tee. Three (3) gate valves are required at this tee 8) Line 3 detail shows an undefined bold line to the south of Line 1. Is this a property line? If so, grey out and label as a property line, 9) There are two (2) instances where the proposed water main is greater than 7 feet depth as measured to top of pipe. 10) You are missing the bend callouts where Line 3 connects to the existing main and further to the east, including magnitude of the bends.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Length of the water main along Oldham is too long. Only that which is necessary to serve the last lot 4-story multi-family shown on the PDP should be shown.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Cost estimate required prior to formal approval.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
MDNR construction permit required prior to formal approval. MDNR concurrence letter will be issued following the submittal of approvable plans.
|
|
|
|