Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
Planning Review
|
Approved with Conditions
|
04/07/2025
|
04/07/2025
|
|
Hector Soto Jr.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY. The associated vacation of right-of-way application (Appl. #PL2024-093) shall complete the approval process and have the ordinance number added to the plat, instead of the County recording number, prior to begining the signature process.
The City Council public hearing is scheduled for April 8, 2025, and April 15, 2025, for the public hearing and second ordinance reading, respectively.
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
04/07/2025
|
04/04/2025
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
GIS Plat Review
|
No Comments
|
04/07/2025
|
03/31/2025
|
|
Kathy Kraemer
|
|
|
GIS Plat Review
|
Corrections
|
02/11/2025
|
02/11/2025
|
|
Kathy Kraemer
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Your POB is wrong. You reference it, but do not actually incorporate the 4.22 ROW that was given to LSMO on Doc 2022E0005322.
The coordinates before the 4.22 ROW was taken indicate N:306934.462m E:860131.444m which is almost your exact coordinate there.
It's expected, then, to be off on the X coordinate, and it is....coordinate is closer to 860132.726m, which is 1.287m, which, converts to 4.22
Please factor in the ROW of 4.22 and adjust your coordinate. Also double check the traverse because starting 4.22 ft off affects the plat lines, and the bearings on the ROW doc don't match the plat.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Plat does not close. Off by ~3ft.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please put all plat dimensions on the outside of the plat, and lot dimensions inside the lot lines. The one near coordinate 4 is missing the plat dimension.
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
02/11/2025
|
02/11/2025
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
No easements are dedicated by this plat because you are defining "utility easement" as "U/E", and the plat shows "U.E.". Ensure all easement callouts on the plat match what is shown on the dedication language. Correction required.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Southwest corner of the plat shows an easement that is tapered. This easement should be ten (10) feet minimum and not tapered. Correction required.
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Corrections
|
02/11/2025
|
02/10/2025
|
|
Hector Soto Jr.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY. The associated vacation of right-of-way application (Appl. #PL2024-093) shall complete the approval process and have the approving ordinance recorded with the County prior to approval of the minor plat. The recording information shall be added to the plat.
Staff is tentatively targeting the March 13, 2025, Planning Commission meeting for the initial public hearing for the requested vacation of right-of-way. The subsequent City Council meeting dates would tentatively be scheduled for April 8, 2025, and April 15, 2025, for the public hearing and second ordinance reading, respectively.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
SIDEWALKS. Extend the linework representing the existing 5' sidewalk along SW Main St to the southern boundary of the proposed lot.
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
11/01/2024
|
11/01/2024
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Splitting this plat into two (2) lots will change the Final Development Plan review process significantly in terms of sanitary sewer and water line review. Why are two (2) lots being proposed? The Final Development Plan was reviewed based on one (1) lot, not two (2) lots. Correction and explanation required.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
No other comments are provided until the above issue has been resolved.
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
11/01/2024
|
10/31/2024
|
|
Erin Ralovo
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Corrections
|
11/01/2024
|
10/29/2024
|
|
Hector Soto Jr.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
LOT LAYOUT. What is the purpose of keeping the subject property as two separate lots (albeit with adjusted lot lines from what currently exists) versus making the entire associated apartment development a single lot? Is the idea that the apartment development will be phased between the two proposed lots? If the intent is phasing, the associated FDP shows no phasing line(s) at all, nor does it show the proposed lot lines from this minor plat. The proposed lot lines need to be overlayed onto the associated FDP for review.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
STREET NAME. This area is a transition point between the NW and NE address grid quadrant. Add a street name label for NE Sycamore St to the right of the street name label for NW Sycamore St.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
ADDRESSES. Label the lots with their respective addresses: Lot 1 - 3 NE Sycamore St; and Lot 2 - 11 NE Sycamore St.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
SIDEWALKS. Add and label 5' wide sidewalks along the NW/NE Sycamore St, NW Sloan St and NW Main St street frontages.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
EASEMENTS. 1) A general utility easement shall be dedicated as part of this plat for the entire portion of the ROW that is proposed to be vacated along the west boundary of the subject property so that there is a continuous easement from the west edge of the existing 10' U/E to the new ROW boundary. 2) With the creation of two lots for the subject development, a blanket cross-access easement between Lots 1 and 2 shall be required. Add a dedication paragraph to that effect to the plat.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
CITY SIGNATURE BLOCK. Replace Josh Johnson's name and title with the following: Aimee Nassif, AICP, Deputy Director of Development Services.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
ROW BOUNDARY. The property boundary configuration at the intersection of NW Main St and NW Sloan St doesn't match the boundary of the proposed ROW vacation under Appl. #PL2024-093. Which is correct? Revise the ROW vacation exhibit, associated FDP and associated minor plat as needed to reflect the correct configuration.
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
No Comments
|
11/01/2024
|
10/25/2024
|
|
Jim Eden
|
|
|
GIS Plat Review
|
Corrections
|
11/01/2024
|
10/23/2024
|
|
Kathy Kraemer
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please make sure all lot dimensions are on the plat. Lot 1 is missing several, and lot 2 is missing 1
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The south line is incorrect. It should be 594.45, because 4.22 was taken for ROW on the referenced doc.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please provide ITB on curve near Sloan and Main, the R=380. After N25-25-39E/22.42
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Vacation must precede platting. Please reference the recorded vacation on the plat. As of now, it is not vacated.
|
|
|