Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
Record Drawings Review
|
No Comments
|
02/04/2022
|
02/02/2022
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
As-graded MDP Review
|
No Comments
|
01/10/2022
|
01/10/2022
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Approved with Conditions
|
02/02/2021
|
02/02/2021
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
02/02/2021
|
01/28/2021
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
01/25/2021
|
01/25/2021
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The note for Option 2 on the cover sheet is still incorrect. It is showing 6 inch MoDOT Type 5 over geogrid. This does not match the typical section view.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sidewalk was not shown, nor the ADA-accessible ramp entering the cul-de-sac. At the present time, no "payment in lieu of" for the sidewalk has been granted by the Dept. Director.
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
01/25/2021
|
01/25/2021
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sidewalk was not waived by City Council for this recently approved subdivision. There was no waiver or modification to UDO sidewalk requirments granted by City Council in its approval. Refer to previous comment regarding required sidewalk.
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
12/29/2020
|
12/29/2020
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Typical section for the street is not correct. The surface course must be either Type 5 or 6, and the base course must be Type 5.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Typical section of the street is not correct if using geogrid. If using geogrid, 10 inches of aggregate must be used rather than 6 inches.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Grading appears to be too steep over most of the project. We are measuring 2:1 slopes over a significant portion of the project.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The island shown at the end of the cul-de-sac should be removed.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The location of sidewalk and ADA-accessible ramps entering the cul-de-sac was missing.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The Master Drainage Plan was missing the basement type for each lot, the MBOE for each lot, and the existing and finish corner elevations for each lot.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Stationing was missing on the plan view of the street.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
A trenching and backfill detail was missing for the pipe installation. Be aware the City has changed the requirements for aggregate on top of the pipe. It is now 12 inches over the pipe rather than the previous 6 inches.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please specify in plain language the rip rap type, the dimensions of the rip rap, the depth of the rip rap, approximate tons of rip rap, and geotextile beneath the rip rap. The calculations shown within the plans are required, but the critical information described above should be provided without consulting a table.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The underdrain detail is missing from the standard details.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Ensure the notes concerning the pavement thickness and subgrade match the typical section view.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Normally, a separate erosion and sediment control plan is required for residential subdivisions. The size of this particular subdivision, however, does not necessarily require the submission of a separate erosion and sediment control plan, unless work shall begin prior to issuance of an infrastructure permit. If work shall commence prior to this time, please submit a separate erosion and sediment control plan to the City.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
A toe wall detail was missing for the flared end section.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The rip rap area appears to be installed in an area greater than the design slope of 13 percent. Please review and revise as appropriate, including the calculations for the rip rap dimensions and sizing.
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
12/29/2020
|
12/22/2020
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sidewalk required along one side of road. Payment in lieu of construction may be an option per UDO criteria and site conditions. South side of road should be considered based on trail location and road alignment to the east/south.
|
|
|