| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
02/25/2022
|
02/22/2022
|
|
|
Loic Nguinguiri, E.I.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
02/04/2022
|
02/04/2022
|
|
|
Loic Nguinguiri, E.I.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
When pipe is to be installed in embankment or fill, the embankment shall be constructed in accordance with APWA Section 2102.6 and shall be built up to a plane at least 18 inches above the top of the pipe prior to the excavation of the pipe trench. Please include the following note: “Compacted fill shall be placed to a minimum of 18” above the top of the pipe prior to installation”. Also, make sure to show/label the limits of the compacted fill placement within storm line 10 profile view, that approximately range from field inlet 10-1 to flared end section 10-0. Use hatching for clarity.
|
|
|
|
|
Record Drawings Review
|
No Comments
|
01/28/2022
|
01/27/2022
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Record Drawings Review
|
Corrections
|
11/08/2021
|
11/11/2021
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
06/04/2018
|
05/31/2018
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
05/21/2018
|
05/21/2018
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.050: Show the existing stockpile area north of the temporary cul-de-sac and include proposed erosion control measures relating to it.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C. 303: Revise the note at CI 7-3 to “Remove Existing FES and Riprap” and add “Remove and Replace 74.54’ – 36” HDPE” pointing to the pipe between CI 7-3 and the existing structure to the south.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Remove the sidewalk label on the east side of SW Lodestone Drive on sheets C.200, C.201, C.204, C.205, and C.211 as there is no sidewalk in that location.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
05/08/2018
|
05/08/2018
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
There is a 5’ Sidewalk label on the east side of Lodestone, but there is no sidewalk proposed on that side of the street. The label was removed from some sheets, but not all. Please remove the label throughout the plan set.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
05/08/2018
|
05/08/2018
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
04/19/2018
|
04/19/2018
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.210: It appears that the location of Section B-B is shown on the wrong side of the baffle wall in the Detention Outlet Structure plan view. Please verify.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
There is a 5’ Sidewalk label on the east side of Lodestone, but there is no sidewalk proposed on that side of the street. Please remove the label throughout the plan set.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please check and revise, as needed, the following from the storm sewer calculation tables and include the updated tables in the Drainage Study, as well:
• Pipe Size, Pipe Slope, Inv Elev (Dn) for both segments of Line 9
• Pipe size for line segment 10.2-10.3
• Line length for pipe segment 10.3-10.4
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Drainage Study:
• Please explain how the Culvert/Orifice Structures information on Page 6 corresponds to the openings in the Outlet Structure included in the plans. This may be done by email.
• The Drainage Study does not include addressing detention for the Water Quality event. Please revise to include.
• Please clearly indicate the 100-year WSE in the Drainage Study. It appears that Section 7 may include this information, but it is not clear.
• Please revise the Conclusions & Recommendations section to address The Reserves at Stoney Creek 3rd Plat and The Manor at Stoney Creek 3rd Plat.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please check and revise, as needed, the Engineer’s estimate of Probable Construction costs as follows:
• 15” – 36” HDPE: The overall total matches the plans, but not the length for each individual size.
• End Sections: The plans show 1-18” FES, 1-24” FES, and 0-30” FES.
• It appears that not all of the plan revisions were included in the revised estimate.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
04/19/2018
|
04/13/2018
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
03/28/2018
|
03/29/2018
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.201: The spot elevations don't match proposed contours near the detention basin. Please review all spot elevations and revise as needed.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.201: Verify MBOEs match proposed grading and 100-year WSE requirements.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.202: Please include information for drainage areas A-D.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.210: Please show the BMP limits in the Plan view.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.210: Clearly indicate the 100-year WSE in both Plan and Profile views, as well as throughout the plan set.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C.203-206: PLease add underdrains to the low points at Sta 1+12 Lodestone and Sta 12+87 Georgetown and remove the underdrain label at the Sta 7+75 Georgetown high point.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.301: Label Field Inlet 1-2 in Plan view.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.304: The Line 13 Profile view shows riprap at FES 13-1. Riprap isn't shown at the location anywhere else in the plan set. Please coordinate this information.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
It does not appear that the Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Costs was revised with this submittal.
• Review and verify quantities for all items
• Revise quantities based on comments for this submittal
• Replace the item for Curbing with items for Type CG-1 Curbing and Type CG-2 Curbing
• Add items for 30" FES and Connection to Existing (Line 10)
• Verify that the formulas are updates, as the totals were incorrect on the estimate submitted
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
I reviewed the 10 year storm pipe table included in the plan set. I will send it under separate cover. Please revise, and extend the revisions to all other storm sewer calculation tables.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please revise the Macro Storm Water Drainage Study as follows:
• Please more clearly indicate the maximum 100-year WSE in the report.
• Update the study to reflect revisions made to the storm sewer calculation tables in the plan set based on review comments. Verify that the information in the study and plan set match.
• Section 10, Maps & Exhibits, listed in the Table of Contents was not included. Please submit a revised study with all sections included.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
03/28/2018
|
03/29/2018
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
02/22/2018
|
02/26/2018
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.205:
• Revise the overlapping text/graphics in the Profile view near Sta 5+00.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.208:
• It does not appear that the turning space for the Type B ramp at the SE corner of Georgetown and Amethyst meets the maximum slope requirements. Please revise.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C.208-C.209:
• Include spot elevation information at all accessible routes through intersections at stop conditions, regardless of proposed street grades.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C.301-C.305:
• Field Inlets 1-7 & 6-2 are shown in a sump condition, with openings on all sides. However, the profile views do not show this condition. Please revise.
• Storm Line 10 connects to an existing storm line after removal of an existing FES. The plan view correctly indicates this connection, but the profile view still shows a structure at that location. Please revise the profile view and add the existing pipe size, slope and flowline elevation at that point.
• Please verify that the riprap dimensions shown in the riprap calculations, Plan view, and Profile view all match.
• Please verify that the Q used in the riprap calculations and matches the Q in the Storm Sewer tables.
• The riprap calculations for FES 13-3 appear to be incorrectly labeled as FES 13-1.
• Riprap is shown at FES 13-1 in the Line 13 Profile view, but nowhere else in the plan set. Please revise as needed.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
• Verify quantities for Asphalt paving, MoDOT Type 5 Base, Geogrid, 15” HDPE, 18” HDPE, and Rip Rap.
• Replace the item for Curbing with items for Type CG-1 and Type CG-2 Curbing.
• Include items for 30” End Section and Connection to Existing (Line 10).
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
For each accessible route through an intersection at a stop condition, include a note on the applicable street profile referencing the intersection detail, with page number, for specific design elevations.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
02/22/2018
|
02/22/2018
|
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The typical section should note the change in curb type as shown on C.100.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Street name signs are needed at the intersection of Amethyst/Hightown Dr (SW corner/inside turn).
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Add intersection detail for Amethyst/Hightown Dr.
|
|
|
Plan detail and completeness review performed by Development Engineering
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
01/18/2018
|
01/18/2018
|
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Generally, a full review of these plans was not completed. It has been determined the plans do not meet the minimum requirements in Section 5204.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The signing plan is incomplete (e.g. missing signs from the plan). Refer to previous comments regarding the signing plan. In addition, separate the designation of stop signs and street name signs since both are not required at each intersection corner installation. Lastly, the signing orientation at Stoney Creek Drive is backwards, Stoney Creek Drive should not be stop controlled.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The vertical profile along Lodestone across half of Georgetown creates a significant reverse crown (or superelevated cross section) along Georgetown through the intersection. A revision of the Georgetown profile may be necessary to maintain minimum K values on Lodestone.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The typical section should label the sidewalk with ADA compliant cross slope, not 2%-4%.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The typical section should provide for 4:1 grading rather than 3:1 grading.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide design information on the plans for the proposed underdrains.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The location of sidewalk along Lodestone seems inconsistent with the location of sidewalk along Lodestone in the adjacent plat.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
ADA Ramp labels on C.100 at the intersection of Hightown and Amethyst should be removed since there are no ADA ramps proposed. The intersection detail sheet also has mis-spellings throughout.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Intersection details lack Station/Offset information for the PC, PT, etc. and should also include curb radius detail. The cul-de-sac should also not radius information and changes (i.e. station/offset) to the typical section.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The plans should include horizontal alignment information.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
01/18/2018
|
01/17/2018
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.001
• A 2% to 4% cross-slope is shown for the sidewalk within the right of way on the typical asphaltic concrete section. Please revise to comply with our standard of 1.5% cross-slope.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C.050-C0.52
• Please revise "Phase 2" to "The Manor at Stoney Creek 2nd Plat" in the sediment basin label.
• Include a legend for inlet protection.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.100
• Remove the “Off-Site Sanitary” label. Show the sanitary sewer extending to the plat line per the Sanitary Sewer plans on this sheet and throughout the plan set.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C.200-C.202
• MBOEs were not provided for any of the lots on the Master Drainage Plan. It would appear that several lots adjacent to field inlets in the sump condition would warrant an MBOE. Please provide MBOEs for these lots, and elevate the MBOE so they are a minimum of 2.0 feet above the 100 year water surface elevation.
• Basement types (e.g., standard, daylight, walkout) were not provided on the Master Drainage Plan.
• Please revise the overlapping graphics at the end section near Lots 90 & 92.
• There is a graphic that appears to be an existing condition that is on Lots 78-80, 91, 101-103. Please remove throughout the plan set.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C.203-C.206
• The overlapping of text and graphics has not been addressed as previously requested. Please revise for clarity.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.207:
• Revise overlapping text for clarity.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.208-C.209
• A 4’ x 4’ turning space is required. It does not appear that the Type B ramps meet this requirement.
• Please add a note specifying the use of KCMMB mix for sidewalks.
• Include detailed plans showing how the intersections will be constructed to accommodate accessible routes through the intersection at stop conditions.
• Ramp designs are missing for the NE & NW corners of the Tanzanite/Georgetown and NW corner of Amethyst/Georgetown intersections.
• FYI – “Intersection” is misspelled in the Intersection/ADA Ramp Elevation title.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C.301-C.305
• Several field inlets are shown in a sump condition, with openings on all sides. However, the profile view shows the tops being flush with the ground. Please correct the profile view to reflect the grading around the field inlets to create a localized sump.
• Include station equations at all structures where multiple lines connect. Include the Line Number in each station label.
• Include the sanitary sewer crossing between FI 1-3 & 1-2 in the Line 1 Profile.
• Include the sanitary sewer crossing between CI 3-4 & 5-1 in the Line 5 Profile.
• CI 5-1 & 5-2 labels are reversed in the Line 5 Plan view.
• The CI 7-1 Top Elevation in the structure label does not match the graphical representation. Revise accordingly.
• The CI 8-4 FL in (S) is missing from the Line 8 Profile.
• The stationing for CI 8-5 appears incorrect in the Line 8 Profile.
• The Storm ID 13-2 FL in is missing from the Line 13 Profile.
• A structure is shown graphically in the Line 10 Profile at the upstream end of Line 10, connecting to existing. The plan view does not indicate a structure at this location. Revise accordingly.
• Rip-rap calculations are not included for all locations, and several do not include the correct structure number. Please clearly indicate the required thickness for each rip-rap installation.
• Show rip-rap at ES 13-3 throughout the plan set.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.600
• Replace the APWA Curb standard detail with the Lee’s Summit Curb & Gutter standard detail.
• Include the Lee’s Summit Sidewalk standard detail.
• Include APWA Erosion and Sediment Control standard details.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Notes should be provided stating that all ADA-accessible ramps shall be constructed along with the subdivision improvements. Sidewalks, however, are not subject to this requirement.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
A SWPPP will be required prior to approval of any land disturbance or prior to approval of the plans, whichever comes first.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Costs
• Verify the quantities for ADA Sidewalk Ramp, 36”/30”/24”/15” HDPE, and 36”/24” HDPE End Section and revise if needed.
• Add line items for Rip-Rap, Outlet Structure, and Underdrain.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
09/25/2017
|
09/29/2017
|
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C001
• Please complete "Lots Thru" or remove from title block.
• Revise the MoDot Base thickness for Option 2 in Street & Storm Sewers Note 1 and the Typical Section.
• Revise the Standard Detail references in Street & Storm Sewers Note 4.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
ESC Sheets C050-052
• Label the location of Temporary Sediment Trap.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C100
• Clearly indicate the plat boundary.
• Remove the MH label on Phase 2 Manor at Stoney Creek Lot 81.
• Include offsite sanitary on the site plan.
• Label manholes consistently. For example, MH A-6 includes the project name while MH A-8 does not.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C200
• Include existing contours.
• The proposed contour labels are difficult to read, please revise for clarity.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C201
• Please clarify if the storm sewer along the east side of SW Stoney Creek Drive is existing, proposed, or future.
• Several elevations overlap other text or graphics, please revise for clarity.
• Lots 79, 101, and 102 have graphics on them that are unlabeled. Please remove or label for clarity.
• Elevations at the intersection of SW Lodestone Dr and SW Georgetown Dr are missing, please revise.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C202
• Include complete storm sewer calculations in the plan set.
• Include detention calculations, outlet design info, and details.
• DA 27 and DA 31 each include multiple inlets. Please revise.
• Please review DA 9 as it does not appear the street grades would allow the flow to make a turn as depicted. Revise as needed.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C203-C206
• Elevations are missing in the Profile views for SW Hightown Drive, SW Tanzanite, and SW Amethyst Drive.
• Review these sheets for clarity. Many overlapping ov text and graphics require revision.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C208
• General Comment Concerning the ADA-Accessible Ramps and ADA-Accessible Ways: The specific details of these features must include, at a minimum, the design details specified in Section 5304.8 of the Design and Construction Manual. Elevation call-outs, although required, are not sufficient. Other design details specified in this section are required, including slope call-outs which comply with the criteria listed in Table LS-5, and section views specified in 5304.8.
• General Comment: All ADA-accessible ramps and ADA-accessible ways must have a specific detail associated with them. Please show the locations of these features, and provide a call-out on the plan view with a specific reference to the sheet number and detail number.
• Review the information included on this sheet. Elevations are missing and overlapping of text and graphics occur many times. Please revise for clarity.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C300
• CI 11-3 is mislabeled.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C301-C305
• Include HGL(10) lines in all storm sewer profiles.
• Include all pipe crossings in the storm sewer profiles with elevation information to confirm adequate separation is provided.
• Include rip-rap d50 information.
• Indicate clearly the removal of existing end sections and how new pipe will connect.
• The stationing does not seem to be consistent. Please review and revise if needed. If pipe lengths and stationing do not correspond, please explain (email is fine).
• Label all tracts.
• Line 11 pipe slopes are missing.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheets C600-601
• Please replace the APWA storm sewer details with City of Lee’s Summit standard details.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
General
• Additional comments that haven’t been included with this review may be required based on revisions due to these comments and submission of missing information.
• Please submit an Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Costs.
• Please submit the SWPPP.
• Please submit Stormwater and Detention studies. They may be combined into one comprehensive study.
• Remove the “Phase 3, The Manor at Stoney Creek” label from Lots 69/70 throughout the plan set.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
09/25/2017
|
09/27/2017
|
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sag K value on Georgetown Dr. near Sta. 3+00 shall be at least 26.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The vertical profile along Lodestone at Georgetown creates a significant reverse crown along Georgetown through the intersection. In addition, the K values for Lodestone do not meet minimums resulting in sight distance concerns for traffic along Lodestone approaching the stop sign.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Intersection Details/Elevations are missing.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Street signing plan is incomplete. For the portions shown, add street name signs at the intersection of Hightown and Amethyst.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Profile mis-labeled and does not accurately depict Stoney Creek Drive. Details for intersection, existing and proposed, of Stoney Creek Drive and Georgetown Drive are missing.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sidewalk should go around the perimeter of the bulb-out, without ramps (Hightown Dr/Amethyst)
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
|
|
|
|
