Lee's Summit

DE C&O #01 Eng Plans – FP/PP

All required engineering plans and studies, including water lines, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, streets and erosion and sediment control shall be submitted along with the final plat and approved prior to the approval of the final plat. All public infrastructure must be substantially complete, prior to the issuance of any building permits.

DE C&O #03 Eng & Insp Fees

All Engineering Plan Review and Inspection Fees shall be paid prior to approval of the associated engineering plans and prior to the issuance of any site development permits or the start of construction (excluding land disturbance permit).

DE C&O #04 Cert FA or Escrow

All subdivision-related public improvements must have a Certificate of Final Acceptance prior to approval of the final plat, unless security is provided in the manner set forth in the City's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Section 7.340. If security is provided, building permits may be issued upon issuance of a Certificate of Substantial Completion of the public infrastructure as outlined in Article 3, Division V, Sections 3.540 and 3.550 and Article 3, Division IV, Section 3.475 of the UDO, respectively.

DE C&O #06 Land Disturbance

A Land Disturbance Permit shall be obtained from the City if groundbreaking will take place prior to the issuance of a site development permit, building permit, or prior to the approval of the Final Development Plan / Engineering Plans.

DE Airport Flyover

The proposed development is located within either the Horizontal Surface, Approach Surface, or Conical Surface of the Part 77 Airspace of the Lee's Summit Municipal Airport. Therefore, this proposed development will be subject to frequent over flights of arriving and departing aircraft. (The radius of the Horizontal Surface is 10,000 feet from the ends of Runway 18-36 and 5,000 feet from the ends of Runway 11-29 and the Conical Surface is 4,000 feet wide. The Approach Surface varies in length and width depending on the runway.)

There is a typo in the easement dedication paragraph. It should read in part “…Section 527.188 RSMo. (2006)…”

Please update the city signature block to reflect Joshua Johnson, AICP, Director of Development Services.

General utility easement(s) appear to be warranted along the west property boundary of Lot 3 since the subdivision of this property will leave the remaining lots to the west landlocked and unable to access the public water main. Please dedicate additional general utility easement along the west property line of Lot 3 to eliminate this issue.

The existing sanitary sewer easement is shown too narrow. The City requires a minimum of twice the depth of the sanitary sewer line assuming the sanitary sewer line is centered within the easement. Please show the location of the sanitary sewer line for the review copy, and delete on the final version. We will need to verify the sanitary line is centered within the easement, has enough width, and if not centered, sufficient width is dedicated on either side of the sanitary sewer line. Please evaluate and revise as appropriate.

The water main along the west property line of Lot 3 was not shown for the review copy, and hence no determination could be made whether the easement width or geometry is sufficient. Please see above comments related to assumptions such as being centered within the easement. We will need a minimum of twice the depth of the water main for the width of any additional easement needed. Please evaluate and revise as appropriate.

A general utility easement of minimum 15 feet width should be shown along the cul-de-sac bulb. Please revise.

An access easement is defined in the dedication language, but does not appear to be shown on the plat. Please evaluate and revise as appropriate.

The sidewalk note specifies sidewalk to be installed with Lot 1, which is not defined on this plat? Please evaluate, and review Planning comments for further information on the sidewalk definition on the plat.