Lee's Summit

PARKING LOT CIRCULATION. The following comment is provided for your information and requires no action at this time: - Should this preliminary development plan application be approved by City Council, additional detailed information regarding pavement markings and traffic signage (e.g. "one-way", "do not enter") managing the one-way traffic circulation around the new building shall be required to be provided as part of the final development plan submittal.

LIGHTING. - All exterior lighting shall comply with the applicable lighting standards found under UDO Section 8.220, 8.250, 8.260, 8.270 and 8.280. Cut sheets of all proposed exterior light fixtures shall be provided for review. No cut-sheet was submitted for the "up/down light fixture" called out on the building elevations. - A photometric plan shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of UDO Section 8.230. No photometric plan was submitted as part of the resubmittal. - Cut-sheets of proposed light fixtures and a photometric plan shall be provided at the time of final development plan application submittal.

DE C&O #01 Eng Plans – FDP/PDP

All required engineering plans and studies, including water lines, sanitary sewers, storm drainage, streets and erosion and sediment control shall be submitted along with the final development plan. All public infrastructure must be substantially complete, prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy.

DE C&O #03 Eng & Insp Fees

All Engineering Plan Review and Inspection Fees shall be paid prior to approval of the associated engineering plans and prior to the issuance of any site development permits or the start of construction (excluding land disturbance permit).

DE C&O #09 FDP Reviews

Certain aspects of the development plan will be further reviewed during the Final Development Plan phase of the project. This includes detailed aspects of the design to help ensure that the plan meets the design criteria and specifications contained in the Design and Construction Manual.

SITE DATA TABLE. Revise the table to address the following: - List the lot area in sq. ft. (The lot area is 182,138 sq. ft. per the plat.) - Existing and proposed floor area ratio (FAR). (There is an error in your FAR calculation. With a total building area of 34,246 sq. ft. and the lot area as cited above, the total proposed FAR is 0.19 [or 1.9%], not 3.2% as you note on the plans.)

ADA PARKING SPACES. Remove the wheel stop at the head of the proposed ADA parking space. City ordinance does not allow the use of wheel stops, except for specific instances that are not present at this site. Protection for the pole on which the ADA parking sign is mounted can be provided by setting the pole mounted sign in a bollard at the head of the space.

PARKING LOT CIRCULATION. The following comment is provided for your information and requires no action at this time: - Should this preliminary development plan application be approved by City Council, additional detailed information regarding pavement markings and traffic signage (e.g. "one-way", "do not enter") managing the one-way traffic circulation around the new building shall be required to be provided as part of the final development plan submittal.

LIGHTING. - All exterior lighting shall comply with the applicable lighting standards found under UDO Section 8.220, 8.250, 8.260, 8.270 and 8.280. Cut sheets of all proposed exterior light fixtures shall be provided for review. No cut-sheet was submitted for the "up/down light fixture" called out on the building elevations. - A photometric plan shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of UDO Section 8.230. No photometric plan was submitted as part of the resubmittal.

MISCELLANEOUS. - The property address is incorrectly labeled as 368 NE Akin Dr. under the legal description on Sheet A1 and on the title block of each plan sheet. The correct address is 3680 NE Akin Dr. - The lot number is incorrectly labeled as Lot 15 under the legal description on Sheet A1 and next to the FAR % listed under the Site Data Table on Sheet A1. The correct lot number is Lot 17.

Code Statement

All issues pertaining to life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures and premises, and to the safety to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations, shall be in accordance with the 2018 International Fire Code.

Code Statement

All issues pertaining to life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures and premises, and to the safety to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations, shall be in accordance with the 2018 International Fire Code.

SITE DATA TABLE. Provide a table that lists the following site information: - Lot area (sq. ft.) - Existing building area (in-line retail bldg) - Proposed building area (out-building) - Total building area - Existing and proposed floor area ratio (FAR) - Existing and proposed impervious site coverage (in sq. ft.) - Existing and proposed total number of parking spaces (Note the number of ADA and non-ADA spaces.) - Required number of parking spaces for existing building area (FYI: 166 spaces based on a retail center calculation of 5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. for the existing 33,150 sq. ft. building. Also, break out the number of required ADA spaces and non-ADA spaces.) - Required number of parking spaces for the proposed total building area (166 + 14 spaces per 1,000 gross sq. ft. of the new out-building. Also, break out the number of required ADA spaces and non-ADA spaces.)

DRIVE-THROUGH. - City ordinance requires a minimum 4 vehicle stacking from the pick-up window plus 4 vehicle stacking from the menu board. The proposed layout only has 3 vehicle stacking from the pick-up window. - As a matter of good planning practice, staff does not support required parking spaces being blocked in by the minimum queueing requirement for the drive-through.

ADA PARKING SPACES. No designation of any ADA parking spaces is shown near the proposed new building. The nearest ADA parking space on the existing site is approximately 100'. An accessible path needs to be provided between the ADA parking spaces and the proposed ADA ramps accessing the new building. Show the location of the ADA spaces and access aisles.

PARKING LOT. - Label the type of new curbing used to border the proposed development. The curbing shall be CG-1 (straight-back). - The circulation for the drive aisle adjacent to the new building needs to be made one-way so as not to create a conflict between drive-through and on-coming traffic.

BUILDING ELEVATIONS. - Elevations for all four sides of the building shall be provided. - Horizontal and vertical elements shall be incorporated on all sides of the building to provide architectural relief for each of the wall planes. In particular, the two long sides require some type of horizontal and verticular feature (e.g. pilaster, canopy, etc.) to break up the long flat walls. - Show the location of all RTUs on the elevations using dashed lines to ensure that the building parapets of a sufficient height to full screen the RTUs from view. Ground-mounted mechanical equipment shall be shown on the site plan and shall be fully screened from view using masonry walls or evergreen landscaping.

LIGHTING. - All exterior lighting shall comply with the applicable lighting standards found under UDO Section 8.220, 8.250, 8.260, 8.270 and 8.280. Cut sheets of all proposed exterior light fixtures shall be provided for review. No cut-sheet was submitted for the "up/down light fixture" called out on the building elevations. - A photometric plan shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements of UDO Section 8.230. No photometric plan was submitted as part of the resubmittal.

Please label street names.

Please label the type of curb.

Is there any proposed grading? Please clarify.

What does “Curb Box” represent?

How is the grate inlet proposed to be blocked?

Show and label the existing storm sewer structure at the NE corner of the parking lot. Is it being removed? The existing drainage is directed into the storm sewer system. This should not be changed by allowing it to flow into traffic through a proposed flume.

The proposed use (described in the narrative) and size of building exceeds the code threshold of trip generation for traffic impact study. The applicant had proposed/discussed a 700 s.f. building at the pre-application meeting; which did not require a traffic impact study. Any building of this use over 1100 s.f. will require a traffic impact study as part of the application to comply with code requirements. Either reduce the building area accordingly or submit a traffic impact study by a qualified traffic engineer.