Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
Record Drawings Review
|
No Comments
|
03/12/2022
|
03/02/2022
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
11/09/2021
|
11/03/2021
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
10/15/2021
|
10/15/2021
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Updated drawings will be required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Substantial Completion. Updated record drawings reflecting the water line revision will be required prior to Final Acceptance.
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
10/15/2021
|
10/14/2021
|
|
Brad Cooley, P.E., RSPI
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please provide all slopes from edge of pavement to headwall (3:1 max).
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Warning sign should be for "Shoulder Ends" instead of narrow road. A supplemental distance plaque should be included under warning sign.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Additional object/roadside hazard signs shall be placed adjacent to the headwall and where the shoulder terminates for both directions. 8 signs total per creek crossing.
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
08/15/2019
|
08/02/2019
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Quantities are not complete and comprehensive; such as pavement marking quantities missing.
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Section Line and Center Line information are inconsistently referenced and missing control points, alignment information to field establish.
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Typical Sections do not clearly reference Section Line and/or Center Line and have a few dimensioning errors (e.g. 24’ dimension for lanes points to edge of existing pavement rather than outside of proposed widening).
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The profile does not specify Section Line or Center Line. Since the Center Line deviates from Section Line through the widening and the Typical Section has the roadway crown at Center Line, but all Stationing is referenced from Section Line…this is confusing and could result in a profile that does not match the typical section roadway crown location.
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The pavement section noted is inconsistent with the pavement section in the typical section. The note is incorrect, the typical section is correct.
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
There is a portion of widening of Pryor Road (excluding shoulder) that begins near Station 3+75 which is not shown on the typical sections or included in the typical section station range.
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Other improvements lack location detail, e.g. sign and mailbox relocations.
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
08/15/2019
|
08/02/2019
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The Engineer's Estimate will be reviewed once quantities are updated on the plans.
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
07/29/2019
|
07/29/2019
|
|
Dawn Bell
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Quantities are not complete and comprehensive; such as pavement marking quantities missing.
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Section Line and Center Line information are inconsistently referenced and missing control points, alignment information to field establish.
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Typical Sections do not clearly reference Section Line and/or Center Line and have a few dimensioning errors (e.g. 24’ dimension for lanes points to edge of existing pavement rather than outside of proposed widening).
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The profile does not specify Section Line or Center Line. Since the Center Line deviates from Section Line through the widening and the Typical Section has the roadway crown at Center Line, but all Stationing is referenced from Section Line…this is confusing and could result in a profile that does not match the typical section roadway crown location.
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The pavement section noted is inconsistent with the pavement section in the typical section. The note is incorrect, the typical section is correct.
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
There is a portion of widening of Pryor Road (excluding shoulder) that begins near Station 3+75 which is not shown on the typical sections or included in the typical section station range.
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Other improvements lack location detail, e.g. sign and mailbox relocations.
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
07/29/2019
|
07/29/2019
|
|
Dawn Bell
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The Engineer's Estimate will be reviewed once quantities are updated on the plans.
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
05/28/2019
|
06/05/2019
|
|
Sue Pyles, P.E.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please address the Traffic Review comments.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Submit an Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Costs.
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
05/28/2019
|
05/28/2019
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Construction Notes, Design Notes, and Typical Sections should be on a separate plan sheet than the Title/Cover Sheet.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Typical Sections need to be included for the various proposed work on Pryor Road; e.g. widening and full depth work.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The residential street section shown is not referenced anywhere in the plans?
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The typical sections should identify proposed and existing pavement separately.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The typical sections should identify the saw cut location for areas of widening (e.g. 10' from centerline). Widening to provide 24 feet of pavement from Napa Valley Drive to County Line Road. Since the existing pavement width ranges from about 20 feet to 22 feet, no more than a typical existing 20' pavement section should be referenced for the widening areas.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The typical section shall require 12' lanes, not 11' lanes and a 4:1 Max. Grading except where the proposed turf (or paved shoulder alternate) requires design and construction of relocated ditch section that may be 3:1.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Typical section shall refer to Pryor Road as Major Arterial and pavement sections revised accordingly (2" Type 5 over 6" Type 6 with 9" MoDOT Type 1 and 95% Compacted Subgrade for Pavement and 2" Type 5 over 4" Type 5 with 9" MoDOT Type 1 95% Compacted Subgrade for Shoulder minimums recommended).
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Demo sheets should either show removal of Pryor Road where full depth removal is proposed and removal of pavement outside the sawcut in widening areas or delete the Demo sheets and call out specific driveway removals on the other plans.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Pryor Road turn lane widening shall have transitional tapers of 245' based on the 35 mph speed limit and 12' lane shift (WS^2/60). This will extend the taper on the north and south ends of the widening.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The introductory taper for the left-turn lane on Pryor shall use reverse curve (300' R) over 150' in lieu of the straight taper.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The plan sheets generally lack construction detail (e.g. alignment, stations, offsets, benchmarks, spacing dimensions, notes, etc.).
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Note that all longitudinal lines shall be high-build paint and symbols/diagonals are preformed thermo material.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Pavement markings need to include edge lines.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The profiles show new pavement alignment where there's only widening (no new centerline). These sections should only show existing profile/pavement.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The profile of Pryor Road at SW Georgetown Drive does not meet minimum Intersection Sight Distance for 35 mph considering the proposed intersection location on Pryor Road south of the vertical crest. Either the crest should be lowered or the VPI needs to move to the intersection of Georgetown Drive.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Include a table of quantities for all bid items and separate the items related to the alternate bid (paved shoulder).
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The Temporary Traffic Control Standard Details are okay for the pavement widening and shoulder work, but a detour plan will be needed for the reconstruction of Pryor Road near Georgetown.
|
|
|