Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
04/21/2017
|
04/20/2017
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
01/23/2017
|
01/13/2017
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Since the applicant's desire is not to provide sanitary sewer service to Lot 1, "Weinel Addition" as specified in the response to comments letter dated Dec. 7, 2016, an off-site sanitary sewer easement shall be established by separate document of 7.5 feet width, along the property to the east of Lot 1, "Weinel Addition". It shall be extended to the northeast corner of Tract A, Village at View High 1st Plat. The off-site easement shall be submitted and recorded prior to approval of these engineering plans.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The geometry of the sanitary sewer has changed since the last round of comments in the vicinity of the connection of the off-site sanitary sewer, and the on-site sanitary sewer. In particular, a new manhole has been shown within tens of feet of the connection point. This is redundant and unnecessary, and not desired by the City. Please show the original alignment, with the sanitary sewer from manhole D-1 to A-15 reverting to one segment, as shown in the previous submittal.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The off-site easement requested in the previous comment above should include the segment from manhole A-15, to a point near the southeast corner of Lot 1, "Weinel Addition". It should be a minimum of 7.5 feet in width to coincide with the platted easement on the south side of the property line.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please refer to comment #4 of the applicant letter dated Nov. 11, 2016. The call-out on the flowline "in" from the south does not match what is shown in the profile view (i.e., the call-out shows the incoming pipe crown being lower than the pipe crown of the receiving pipe). More importantly, however, the new manhole A-1 is redundant, and unneccessary.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please refer to comment #7 of the previous applicant letter dated Nov. 11, 2016. Grading beyond manhole A-6 was requested (now re-named A-7 due to the addition of the redundant and unneccessary manhole at the connection point to the off-site sanitary sewer), but was not provided. As requested in the previous applicant letter, please provide the grading beyond this manhole.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please refer to comment #9 of the previous applicant letter dated Nov. 11, 2016. The 7.5 foot platted easement along the north property boundary was not shown on all sheets as requested in the previous applicant letter. In addition, the off-site easements required along the north property boundary (see previous comments concerning Lot 1, "Weinel Addition") were not shown.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please refer to comment #10 of the previous applicant letter dated Nov. 11, 2016. the flowline in and out elevations for manhole A-6 (now re-named as A-7 due to the addition of the redundant and unneccesary manhole) do not appear to make sense. A 90 degree bend as shown will require a drop of 0.5 feet.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please refer to comment #11 of the previous applicant letter dated Nov. 11, 2016. This comment was not addressed, and pertained to manhole A-6 (now re-named A-7 due to the addition of the redundant and unneccesary manhole at the connection point to the off-site sanitary sewer) on Sheet C.403.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.403: The sanitary sewer is too shallow between manhole A-6 and A-7. The minimum depth of cover is 3.5 feet. It appears there are instances where the depth is 2.5 feet.
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
08/12/2016
|
11/11/2016
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please label the lot numbers on each sheet, and please ensure they match what is shown on the plat.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
It appears the sanitary sewer should be extended to the southeast corner of Lot 3 to comply with the requirement that sanitary sewer be extended to the plat boundary.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
It appears the sanitary sewer should be extended to the southeast corner of Lot 1, Weinel Addition to comply with the requirement to extend sanitary sewer to the plat boundary.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.402: The sanitary sewer line at manhole A-14 is shown with the crown of the pipe lower than the crown of the receiving 15" pipe. Please raise the 8" line, or lower the 15" line.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.402: Manhole A-3 and the sanitary sewer line immediately upstream and downstream is too shallow. The minimum depth is 42".
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.403: What is the small inset drawing in the middle right hand side of the drawing? It does not appear to serve any purpose.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.404: What is the proposed grade downstream of manhole A-6? It is omitted on the profile view.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
All Sheets: Define P/S. Is this a parking setback? If so, then provide a definition in the legend.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Easements do not appear to be labeled on many of the plan sheets. Please provide labels and widths of all easements.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.404: The flowline in and out elevations for manhole A-6 do not appear to make sense. Be aware that the 90 degree bend will require a 0.5 ft drop.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C.403: Please see previous comment concerning manhole A-6. The same comments apply.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sanitary sewer laterals were not shown. Please show the locations of all sanitary sewer laterals on the plan view of each sanitary sewer segment, along with proper stationing, slope, elevations, etc.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please be aware of the requirements contained in the building code concerning sanitary sewer connections. Please consult with Joe Frogge for specific requirements for connecting multiple apartments to one (1) sanitary sewer lateral.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please be aware that off-site sanitary sewer easements will be required for this project.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
An itemized and sealed Engineers Estimate of Probable Construction Costs should accompany your final submittal drawings.
|
|
|