| Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
|
Engineering Review
|
Approved with Conditions
|
02/11/2022
|
02/10/2022
|
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
02/15/2022
|
02/09/2022
|
|
|
Loic Nguinguiri, E.I.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Would it be possible to add the area inlet protection symbol? To the legend, as shown in the correspondence email.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The grading plan sheet already shows ESC protection added to the four (4) area/field inlets located right on the other side of the southern property line, as secondary ESC measure. Would it be possible to show them as well on sheets C.051 and C.052 ?
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The proposed grading contour lines shown over the proposed swales do not appear to reflect the 5 feet wide base, as indicated in the 100 year overflow swale table. Please revise, accordingly.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Doesn’t a $35,000 item cost for clearing/grubbing (over 9.65 acres) and disturbing/grading (37,000+ C.Y. of soil) appear low? Please clarify/revise.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please submit a SWPPP report.
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
02/03/2022
|
02/03/2022
|
|
|
Loic Nguinguiri, E.I.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Would it be possible to add the area inlet protection symbol? To the legend, as shown in the correspondence email.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The grading plan sheet already shows ESC protection added to the four (4) area/field inlets located right on the other side of the southern property line, as secondary ESC measure. Would it be possible to show them as well on sheets C.051 and C.052 ?
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
The proposed grading contour lines shown over the proposed swales do not appear to reflect the 5 feet wide base, as indicated in the 100 year overflow swale table. Please revise, accordingly.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Doesn’t a $35,000 item cost for clearing/grubbing (over 9.65 acres) and disturbing/grading (37,000+ C.Y. of soil) appear low? Please clarify/revise.
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Correction
Corrective Action Required
Please submit a SWPPP report.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
02/03/2022
|
01/31/2022
|
|
|
Brad Cooley, P.E., RSPI
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
12/22/2021
|
12/17/2021
|
|
|
Karen Quackenbush
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please see previous submittal comment no. 1. We would like to have a secondary measure of protection in place for the field inlets. Please add inlet protection to the three field inlets, and update the quantities on sheet C.001.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please see previous submittal comment no. 3. Given the fact that the project will disturb an area greater than 1 acre, please submitt a SWPPP and MDNR permit.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please address previous comment no. 6. For sheet C.200 in the upper right corner, the bar scale shows 1"=40'; however the text indicates 1"=50'. On the title block, it still says Grading Plan Street, Stormwater, Master Drainage Plans for: and it should say Erosion and Sediment Control Plans for: Napa Valley 5th Plat
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
12/15/2021
|
12/14/2021
|
|
|
Brad Cooley, P.E., RSPI
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
10/05/2021
|
10/05/2021
|
|
|
Loic Nguinguiri, E.I.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Revise the symbol for inlet protection (gutter buddy or equivalent) shown in the legend to match the icons/symbols shown in plan view.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
On sheet C.050, provide ESC protection to the 3 other existing field inlets located along the southern borderline, due the proposed grading topography.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
On sheet C.051, clearly show the ESC protection measure(s) provided for new storm inlets. A couple of new inlets near the southern borderline, for example, appear to not have any ESC protection.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
On sheet C.200, revise the overlapping 992-elevation inscription shown along Mondavi Lane.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
On sheet C.200, elevation 992 is wrongfully shown along proposed elevation 990 contour line, west of Mondavi Lane. Make sure to revise.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
On sheet C.200, remove the MDP language from the title block. Make sure to also correct the discrepancy shown in the plan view scale.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Revise the quantity of inlet protections shown on the cover sheet and on the EOOPCC sheet.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Include a rip rap cost item on the EOOPCC sheet.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please provide/label the estimated cut and fill quantities on the grading plan sheet for the 9-10 acres of disturbance area. Clearing & grading cost item shown on the EOOPCC sheet may be revised accordingly.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please provide a SWPPP report and a Missouri DNR permit.
|
|
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
10/05/2021
|
10/05/2021
|
|
|
Brad Cooley, P.E., RSPI
|
|
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
08/16/2021
|
08/17/2021
|
|
|
Loic Nguinguiri, E.I.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Include the developer’s information and direct telephone number.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Revise the FEMA panel number.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Show/label the FEMA 100-year floodplain boundary (zone AE) within the set of plans. Additional floodplain development permit may be required in order to perform grading work within the floodplain limits.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
On the ESC phase 1 plan sheet, are the two (2) discontinuities along the northern silt fence barrier made on purpose? if not, please add.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide ESC protection to the field inlet located northeast of lot 249 along the southern border.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Label/show proposed grading contour elevations over the panoply of circular lines shown to the northeast within the project site.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Increase the font size of the grading contour elevations, labeled on the grading plan sheet, in order to improve and ease readability.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please note that no review of the detention basin design is included with this review, and that grading was looked at for ESC purposes only.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please make sure to obtain the appropriate permission or temporary construction easement to perform grading work outside of the property limits, as necessary.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide a SWPPP report and a Missouri DNR permit.
|
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please provide an Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (EOOPCC) sheet.
|
|
|
|
