Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
Engineering Review
|
Approved with Conditions
|
|
03/07/2016
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
DE Engineers Estimate
Corrective Action Required
The Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Costs has been accepted for this project, and the Public Works Review and Inspection Fee of $969.60 (which is based on 3% of the total infrastructure cost) must be paid prior to the issuance of an infrastructure permit and/or the final processing of a building permit from the Codes Administration Department.
|
|
DE Contact Field Eng. Inspector
Corrective Action Required
Contact Public Works Inspections at (816) 969-1800 at least 48 hours prior to the onset of construction.
|
|
PW Submit Land Disturbance (DELETE)
Corrective Action Required
If ground breaking will take place prior to the issuance of a building permit, please submit a Land Disturbance Permit application and the required attachments to the Erosion Control Specialist.
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
No Comments
|
|
03/04/2016
|
|
Ron Seyl
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved with Conditions
|
03/02/2016
|
03/03/2016
|
|
Jim Eden
|
|
Misc.
Corrective Action Required
The location of the propane tank was not shown on the resubmittal.
Provide location on the set of plans reviewd for a Building Permit.6104.3 Container location.
LP-gas containers shall be located with respect to buildings, public ways and lot lines of adjoining property that can be built upon, in accordance with Table 6104.3.
|
|
Code Statement
Corrective Action Required
All issues pertaining to life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures and premises, and to the safety to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations, shall be in accordance with the 2012 International Fire Code.
For information only.
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Corrections
|
02/23/2016
|
02/24/2016
|
|
Ron Seyl
|
|
Corrective Action Required
ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
- In order for the FDP to be approvaable, revised architectural plans need to be submitted. The orientation of the hangar on the Final Development Plan Sheet differs from the orientation of the building on Sheets A101 - 105. On the Final Development Plan, the Pilot Lounge is shown being located on the west side of the hangar. On architectural Sheets A101 - 105, it is located on the north side of the hangar.
- Please submit achitectural plans that are reduced in size. Per the City's UDO, the maximum allowable plan size is 24” x 36” with one inch border.
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
02/23/2016
|
02/24/2016
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
An itemized and sealed Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Costs was not included in the re-submittal. The Engineering Plan Review and Inspection Fee is based on this estimate, and calculated at 3% of the total. Items to include in the estimate include: 1) grading to establish proper drainage, 2) grading for parking and access drive, 3) removal and replacement of poor quality subgrade (estimated quantitiy), 4) compaction of drive access and parking lot, 5) pavement, 6) erosion and sediment control, 7) final restoration, including sodding, seeding, fertilizer, mulch, and topsoil.
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Approved with Conditions
|
02/23/2016
|
02/22/2016
|
|
Jim Eden
|
|
Code Statement
Corrective Action Required
All issues pertaining to life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures and premises, and to the safety to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations, shall be in accordance with the 2012 International Fire Code.
For information only.
|
|
Misc.
Corrective Action Required
The location of the propane tank was not shown on the resubmittal.
Provide location on the set of plans reviewd for a Building Permit.6104.3 Container location.
LP-gas containers shall be located with respect to buildings, public ways and lot lines of adjoining property that can be built upon, in accordance with Table 6104.3.
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
02/23/2016
|
02/19/2016
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
01/26/2016
|
01/27/2016
|
|
Ron Seyl
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
01/26/2016
|
01/26/2016
|
|
John Barker
|
|
Corrective Action Required
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Corrections
|
01/26/2016
|
01/26/2016
|
|
Ron Seyl
|
|
Corrective Action Required
ORIENTATION
As referenced in the staff letter dated January 6, 2016, the orientation of the hangar on the Final Development Plan Sheet seems to differ from the orientation of the building on Sheets A101 - 105. On the Final Development Plan, the Pilot Lounge is shown being located on the west side of the hangar. On Sheets A101 - 105, it is located on the north side of the hangar. Please revise the plans so that the orientation of the hangar is the same on all submitted information.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
WALL LIGHTING
As referenced in the staff letter dated January 6, 2016, provide manufacturer specifications for the proposed exterior wall packs for review and approval. Fixtures shall have full 90-degree cut-offs so as to direct the light downward.
The specifications should also include the wattage of the exterior wall packs.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
As referenced in the staff letter dated January 6, 2016, provide the manufacturer’s specification sheets for proposed mechanical equipment to be used.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
ROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNITS
Per the staff letter dated January 6, 2016, are any rooftop mechanical units proposed for the hangar? If so, provide elevations with a dashed line indicating the roof line and rooftop mechanical equipment. Per the City's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), all roof-mounted equipment shall be screened entirely from view by using parapet walls at the same height as the mechanical units.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
PLAN SIZE
As referenced in the staff letter dated January 6, 2016, please submit architectural plans that are reduced in size. Per the City's UDO, the maximum allowable plan size is 24” x 36” with one inch border.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
SCREENING
As referenced in the staff letter dated January 6, 2016, provide information on the number, species and size of the proposed ground mounted mechanical unit screening.
The following are the minimum plant sizes to be used in satisfying the requirements of the UDO:
1. Medium shrubs, 18 to 24 inch balled and burlapped or 2-gallon container.
2. Large shrubs, 24 to 30 inch balled and burlapped or 5-gallon container
|
|
Corrective Action Required
SCALE
The scale does not seem to be correct on the final development plan.
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Corrections
|
01/26/2016
|
01/25/2016
|
|
Jim Eden
|
|
Code Statement
Corrective Action Required
All issues pertaining to life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures and premises, and to the safety to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations, shall be in accordance with the 2012 International Fire Code .
For information only.
|
|
Misc.
Provide a complete site plan showing hydrants, fire lanes, and the location of the propane tank.
The fire lane and the location of the propane tank were not shown on the resubmittal.
|
|
Fire Lane Required
FC 503.1.1 -Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet (45 720 mm) of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility.Exception: The fire code official is authorized to increase the dimension of 150 feet (45 720 mm) where:
1. The building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed n accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 9033.1.2 or 903.3.1.3.
2. Fire apparatus access roads cannot be installed because of location on property, topography, waterways, nonnegotiable rades or other similar conditions, and an approved alternative means of fire protection is provided.
Provide an approved fire lane to the southwest corner of the building.
|
|
Fire Lanes
IFC 503.2.1 - Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20 feet (6096 mm), exclusive of shoulders, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (4115 mm).
The driveway and south end of the parking lot shall meet imposed load and width requirements.
|
|
Misc.
Corrective Action Required
Provide NFPA Hangar Group designation. Not included in FDP resubmittal.
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
01/05/2016
|
01/06/2016
|
|
John Barker
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The Final Development Plan (FDP) shows a sanitary sewer tank located south of the Pilot Lounge. Sheet A105 shows a septic tank located north of the pilot lounge. This should be a holding tank.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
There is no paved access to the holding tank for pumping out the tank.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Show the locations of the water line, water meter, sanitary sewer, and holding tank on the FDP.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Hangar Final floor Elevation of 996.2 makes the slope of the ramp about 6%. That is very steep for an aircraft ramp.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The north arrow on the FDP is correct, but it is incorrect on the Architectural Plans
|
|
Corrective Action Required
In order to calculate the Public Works engineering Plan Review and Inspection Fee, a sealed Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost shall accompany the final submittal copies. The itemized estimate, including labor and materials, shall include all public infrastructure, sidewalks, parking, driveways, water and sewer lines, holding tank, grading, erosion and sediment control, and revegetation.
|
|
HANGAR T, LEES SUMMIT AIRPORT
|
Planning Review
|
Corrections
|
01/05/2016
|
01/05/2016
|
|
Ron Seyl
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The orientation of the hangar on the Final Development Plan Sheet seems to differ from the orientation of the building on Sheets A101 - 105. On the Final Development Plan, the Pilot Lounge is shown being located on the west side of the hangar. On Sheets A101 - 105, it is located on the north side of the hangar. Please revise the plans so that the orientation of the hangar is the same on all submitted information.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Label the width of the driveway on the Final Development Plan.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide a Site Plan with finished grades showing 1-foot contours for the entire site (2-foot contour intervals may be allowed by the Director, depending on the site).
Per the City's Unified Development Ordinance, accessible parking spaces shall be located on a surface with a slope not exceeding one (1) vertical foot in fifty (50) horizontal feet.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide manufacturer specifications for the proposed exterior wall packs for review and approval. Fixtures shall have full 90-degree cut-offs so as to direct the light downward.
The specifications should also include the wattage of the exterior wall packs.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide the manufacturer’s specification sheets for proposed mechanical equipment to be used.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Show the locations of existing and proposed fire hydrants on the Final Development Plan.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Are any rooftop mechanical units proposed for the hangar? If so, provide elevations with a dashed line indicating the roof line and rooftop mechanical equipment. Per the City's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), all roof-mounted equipment shall be screened entirely from view by using parapet walls at the same height as the mechanical units.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Please submit plans that are reduced in size. Per the City's UDO, the maximum allowable plan size is 24” x 36” with one inch border.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Provide information on the number, species and size of the proposed ground mounted mechanical unit screening.
The following are the minimum plant sizes to be used in satisfying the requirements of the UDO:
1. Medium shrubs, 18 to 24 inch balled and burlapped or 2-gallon container.
2. Large shrubs, 24 to 30 inch balled and burlapped or 5-gallon container.
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
01/05/2016
|
12/31/2015
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
Corrections
|
01/05/2016
|
12/28/2015
|
|
Jim Eden
|
|
Code Statement
Corrective Action Required
All issues pertaining to life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures and premises, and to the safety to fire fighters and emergency responders during emergency operations, shall be in accordance with the 2012 International Fire Code.
Provide a Code Analysis for the project including NFPA 409 Hangar Group desigination.
|
|
Misc.
Corrective Action Required
Provide a complete site plan showing hydrants, fire lanes, and the location of the propane tank.
|
|
Fire Lane Required
Corrective Action Required
IFC 503.1.1 -Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet (45 720 mm) of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility.Exception: The fire code official is authorized to increase the dimension of 150 feet (45 720 mm) where:
1. The building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed n accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 9033.1.2 or 903.3.1.3.
2. Fire apparatus access roads cannot be installed because of location on property, topography, waterways, nonnegotiable rades or other similar conditions, and an approved alternative means of fire protection is provided.
|
|
Hydrants
IFC 507.5.1- Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 300 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official.
|
|
Imposed Loads
Corrective Action Required
IFC 503.2.3 -Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities.
|
|
|