Review Type |
Outcome |
Est. Completion Date |
Completed |
Planning Review
|
No Comments
|
09/19/2011
|
09/20/2011
|
|
Hector Soto Jr.
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
No Comments
|
09/19/2011
|
09/20/2011
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
No Comments
|
09/19/2011
|
09/15/2011
|
|
Jim Eden
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
No Comments
|
09/19/2011
|
09/14/2011
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
|
Planning Review
|
Corrections
|
08/19/2011
|
08/22/2011
|
|
Hector Soto Jr.
|
|
Planning Correction
Corrective Action Required
TEMPORARY CURBING. The parking lot abutting Douglas Street is shown to be constructed in two phases. Temporary asphalt curbing shall be constructed along the northern limits of the Phase 1 improvements where the parking lot will be expanded in the future.
|
|
Planning Correction
Corrective Action Required
LIGHTING.
- Provide the parking lot light fixture pole height. The overall maximum pole height shall not exceed 28 feet.
- Provide a photometric plan showing foot-candle information in accordance with Section 7.280 of the UDO.
|
|
Planning Correction
Corrective Action Required
LANDSCAPING. Sheets L1.0, L1.1 and L1.2 show the proposed Honeylocust trees as 2" caliper in size. The UDO requires all deciduous trees, whether ornamental or shade trees, to be a miminim 3" caliper in size at the time of planting.
|
|
Planning Correction
Corrective Action Required
SCALE. The scale on Sheet C7.0 is incorrectly shown as 1"=10'. Revise it to 1"=20'.
|
|
Planning Correction
Corrective Action Required
PAVEMENT WIDTH. Driveways and internal drive aisles serving two-way traffic shall have a minimum pavement width of 24', excluding curb and gutter. Both driveways for the Douglas parking lot are shown with a pavement width of 20'. The entrances to the individual parking aisles drives, where they are bounded by islands on both sides, are also shown with 20' of pavement width. Revise the driveways and drive aisle entrance widths to have a minimum pavement width of 24' (not including curb and gutter).
|
|
|
Engineering Review
|
Corrections
|
08/19/2011
|
08/19/2011
|
|
Gene Williams, P.E.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet A-1 shows Phase 2 in dashed lines, which suggests to our field inspector that this phase will be performed at a later date and under a different Final Development Plan. Please clearly show that Phase 2 will be part of this plan either by labels or a separate shading scheme.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C1.0 "General Notes" No. 5 should be revised to reflect the new phone number for Public Works Inspections of 969-1829.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
Sheet C8.0 calls out Type II curb inlets. Please change this to Type 2.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The stormwater report included in the submittal package is ambiguous concerning the suitability of the existing detention basin to handle the stormwater flows generated by the addition of the parking lots. In the revised report, please discuss whether the detention basin large enough, or will it need to be expanded? The report shows a drainage area of 26.32 acres; where was this number obtained? Does this include the entire site?
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The stormwater report included with the submittal package does not show and/or discuss the outlet structure for the detention basin. It is not clear from the report how the staging is included in the calculations since the report appears to consist of a general summary output from the software package.
|
|
Corrective Action Required
The plans should show the location of the detention basin outlet structure, including pipe sizes, orifice sizes, weir sizes, etc. In addition, please show the general location of the reinforced box culvert under Interstate 470.
|
|
|
Fire Review
|
No Comments
|
08/19/2011
|
08/18/2011
|
|
Jim Eden
|
|
Corrective Action Required
|
|
|
Traffic Review
|
Corrections
|
08/19/2011
|
08/16/2011
|
|
Michael Park
|
|
Traffic Correction
Corrective Action Required
Sidewalk Recommendations: An alternative alignment for the sidewalk that connects to the north side of the proposed driveway and crosses west through the existing parking lot islands directly to the existing sidewalk at the island nearest the hospital. This makes the pedestrian access more direct and the proposed intersection pedestrian accommodations safer. Eliminate the ramp directed west from the south side of the proposed driveway, the recommended alignment makes this ramp unnecessary. Add a ramp that connects the proposed sidewalk along Douglas to the existing sidewalk along Douglas about midway across the property and connect to the parking lot.
|
|
|